No but the person I was speaking to did say taxation was immoral. You don't see how taxation being immoral makes using tax dollars immoral? It's the same reason they seize the assets of mob bosses' wives and took Bernie Madoff's house, stealing invalidates how you spend that money. It's all immoral, at least from a legal prospective.
When did I shift definitions? Please find me the actual post where that happened. If you would just admit that you entered an economic debate without knowing perhaps the most fundamental economic term in modern times, I wouldn't keep bringing it up. But your pathetic whining about it every time it's brought up goes to show how embarrassed you are about it. You know next to nothing about economics. This is evident in how you go from a nominal moderate of some sort to a Von Mises style liberal when discussing leftist ideals.
To discuss this again, when one doesn't believe in private property, they don't believe that the wealth one accumulated in a capitalistic system is their's. Property is theft and such. It's not a matter of telling someone what to do with their money, it's saying it's not their money.
Ok, just to lay this out for you. You don't know me. Anyone of pretty much any conceivable background could be college. You have this picture of me that you've created whole cloth out of your imagination. Like most things you say, it's wrong. I've worked for years, I work to pay for my loans now while taking 19 credit hours in a dual major. My family lost our home in the recession. Don't lecture me on capitalism's generosity. You seem to think being a college students limits my ability to criticize capitalism, despite the devastating effect neoliberalism has had on public education.
Frankly, your condescension belies your weakness in arguement. You offer no well sounded philosophy or statistical backups, you appeal to emotion through smilies and high handedness. In short, you're a clown. But we all already knew that.
