why did whites keeps blacks from fukking white women but fukked black women? Someone explain........

[Cabbage Patch]

’’But Will It Last?’’: Marital Instability Among
Interracial and Same-Race Couples*

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00491.x/pdf

(and Pike, the attacks against black women are unnecessary -- particularly when you then call someone else a cac.)

 

[pike]

’’But Will It Last?’’: Marital Instability Among
Interracial and Same-Race Couples*

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00491.x/pdf

(and Pike, the attacks against black women are unnecessary -- particularly when you then call someone else a cac.)

the truth is not an attack. Cacs is nothing. If blacks had lynched and oppressed whites for centuries and before they hung them from a tree screamed cac, then you would have a point. Since that has not happened you dont have one

 

[GiGi]

I'm pretty sure the highest divorce rates are between white men and white women So you can keep your lipstickalley fantasy stats to yourself. The kardashians were already rich no one was pimping anyone. Kim was fukking with brothers before she got famous. The reason black women like yourself hate kim kardashian so much is because here she beautiful rich, white women that openly prefers brothers. Not only that but she likes the darkskinned brothers, ya know the ones a lot of black women didnt want in the 80s. No white man on a kim kardashian level, I guess a handsome famous throrough white dude chooses black women. When they do, it's usually a mixed one, like a paula patton. THats what burns you black bytches to the core

I will only address the bolded statement as the rest of your post is an ignorant, irrational, low level thinker, self hating drama queen rant.


Using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Cycle VI), the likelihood of divorce for interracial couples to that of same-race couples was compared. Comparisons across marriage cohorts revealed that, overall, interracial couples have higher rates of divorce, particularly for those that married during the late 1980s.[9] The authors found that gender plays a significant role in interracial divorce dynamics: According to the adjusted models predicting divorce as of the 10th year of marriage, interracial marriages that are the most vulnerable involve White females and non-White males relative to White/White couples. White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples, while White wife/Asian husband marriages are 59% more likely to end in divorce compared to White/White unions. Conversely, White men/non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates. Asian wife/White husband marriages show only 4% greater likelihood of divorce by the 10th year of marriage than White/White couples. In the case of Black wife/White husband marriages, divorce by the 10th year of marriage is 44% less likely than among White/White unions. Intermarriages that did not cross a racial barrier, which was the case for White/Hispanic White couples, showed statistically similar likelihoods of divorcing as White/White marriages.

Basically White women's marriages (outside of WM) tend to not last. Just ask Kim K, she's on to her 3rd black husband.

 

[GiGi]

LOL @Deetee got mad and removed rep points for me posting actual stats on the instability of BM/WW marriages....LOL I guess the truth hurts the feelings of some negroes

I will only address the bolded statement as the rest of your post is an ignorant, irrational, low level thinker, self hating drama queen rant.


Using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Cycle VI), the likelihood of divorce for interracial couples to that of same-race couples was compared. Comparisons across marriage cohorts revealed that, overall, interracial couples have higher rates of divorce, particularly for those that married during the late 1980s.[9] The authors found that gender plays a significant role in interracial divorce dynamics: According to the adjusted models predicting divorce as of the 10th year of marriage, interracial marriages that are the most vulnerable involve White females and non-White males relative to White/White couples. White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples, while White wife/Asian husband marriages are 59% more likely to end in divorce compared to White/White unions. Conversely, White men/non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates. Asian wife/White husband marriages show only 4% greater likelihood of divorce by the 10th year of marriage than White/White couples. In the case of Black wife/White husband marriages, divorce by the 10th year of marriage is 44% less likely than among White/White unions. Intermarriages that did not cross a racial barrier, which was the case for White/Hispanic White couples, showed statistically similar likelihoods of divorcing as White/White marriages.

Basically White women's marriages (outside of WM) tend to not last. Just ask Kim K, she's on to her 3rd black husband.

 

[Deetee]

LOL @Deetee got mad and removed rep points for me posting actual stats on the instability of BM/WW marriages....LOL I guess the truth hurts the feelings of some negroes

Negged you cause from ur posts you've got bedwench tendencies idgaf about no stats cuz I'm not in an interracial relationship.

 

[godkiller]

I wish that people like yourself would stop attempting to equate black men dating white women in 2014 to a white man's access to black women in 1814.

Stop it!

There were some black women whose chose such, and then they were some who didn't, but the dynamic and result is the same. In the end: cacs control black women and she becomes his slave.

 

[godkiller]

In general, cac supremacy is white male supremacy. Their plan, as always, is to step on the black man's neck and do whatever they want besides.

And over this 150-200 year period the desire (or ability) to protect the black woman was basically bred out of black men. The only way that black men could survive during slavery was to abandon their natural male inclination to protect their wives, children and household. THIS was the ultimate emasculation of the black male in America.

This statement isn't supported by anything resembling fact. There was no "household" during slavery. Male and female slaves were kept purposely separated and busy to avoid such thinking. Some slaves rebelled immediately, others later, others in subtle ways, etc. There is no reckoning that there was any "breeding out of the desire to protect" besides. Black men in the USA are hyper-masculine and protective of their mates, often to their own detriment. They have high aggression and violence rates, which correlate with masochism, which in turn correlates with protective desire, among other hallmarks of hyper-masculinity. This rails against your notion any "desire to protect" was bred out of black men; that implies docility and black men are anything but docile. You are an idiot.

Nope. Black men are now obsessed with flucking the white man's women. Many Black men who have earned wealth are freely and happily giving black wealth BACK to white men through their white daughters. Black men are still enriching the white man. During slavery it was through direct labor but now black men PAY white men for the "privilege" to fluck their daughters for a few years....and then the WW divorce BM and take half or more of the BM's wealth. White people still win.

This is complete nonsense. Cacs don't want their women with black men; they consider anyone mixed with black to be inferior and consider white women with black men to be under nikka's control. When they have a black wench like you, they consider you to be under their control. THAT is why they are OK with not letting black women with white women but are alright with vice versa. because controllin black wench c00ns is just a testament to white supremacy.That is how they see it and have ALWAYS seen it.

Many biracials have black partners and the white man wins nothing through it. There are legions of cacs whose very worse nightmare is that their daughter ends up with a black man; that is why they have railed against it for 300 years. You are living in a fantasy which does not conform to the real world, as the behavior of cacs note.

 

[GiGi]

Negged you cause from ur posts you've got bedwench tendencies idgaf about no stats cuz I'm not in an interracial relationship.

And how many PAWGing Bed Bucks™ have you negged? No need to answer hypocrite.

 

[godkiller]

I will only address the bolded statement as the rest of your post is an ignorant, irrational, low level thinker, self hating drama queen rant.


Using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Cycle VI), the likelihood of divorce for interracial couples to that of same-race couples was compared. Comparisons across marriage cohorts revealed that, overall, interracial couples have higher rates of divorce, particularly for those that married during the late 1980s.[9] The authors found that gender plays a significant role in interracial divorce dynamics: According to the adjusted models predicting divorce as of the 10th year of marriage, interracial marriages that are the most vulnerable involve White females and non-White males relative to White/White couples. White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples, while White wife/Asian husband marriages are 59% more likely to end in divorce compared to White/White unions. Conversely, White men/non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates. Asian wife/White husband marriages show only 4% greater likelihood of divorce by the 10th year of marriage than White/White couples. In the case of Black wife/White husband marriages, divorce by the 10th year of marriage is 44% less likely than among White/White unions. Intermarriages that did not cross a racial barrier, which was the case for White/Hispanic White couples, showed statistically similar likelihoods of divorcing as White/White marriages.

Basically White women's marriages (outside of WM) tend to not last. Just ask Kim K, she's on to her 3rd black husband.

The "low divorce rate" is just a trick of the numbers. In truth, it is low sample size, advanced marrying age, corresponding wealth which account for the low marriage rate in BW/WM couples. These variables lower the divorce rate for every couple, it's just that all other couples are more evenly distributed across the population, whereas the BW/WM is not. Older people and richer people get divorced less in general (younger-married and poorer people get divorced more).

Let me explain: in normal society, blacks and whites marry at far younger ages to their own groups respectively, which pushes down the average age and the average wealth (as well as education) down relative to the BW/WM. The normal black and white marriage population is "representative" of the groups, while far more rare (like BW/WM) is not. So the "low divorce rate" for BW/WM couples is merely a trick of the numbers. It is most likely a function of 1) low sample size and 2) variables like older average marrying age, wealth, education, etc (which only matter b/c the number is so low in the first place). If you control for older marrying age, wealth and education for white couples (for example), the divorce rate for wealthier white couples (that married later) undoubtedly falls, which makes the case. As such the BW/WM marriage rate isn't "real".

 

[GiGi]

In general, cac supremacy is white male supremacy. Their plan, as always, is to step on the black man's neck and do whatever they want besides.



This statement isn't supported by anything resembling fact. There was no "household" during slavery. Male and female slaves were kept purposely separated and busy to avoid such thinking. Some slaves rebelled immediately, others later, others in subtle ways, etc. There is no reckoning that there was any "breeding out of the desire to protect" besides. Black men in the USA are hyper-masculine and protective of their mates, often to their own detriment. They have high aggression and violence rates, which correlate with masochism, which in turn correlates with protective desire, among other hallmarks of hyper-masculinity. This rails against your notion any "desire to protect" was bred out of black men; that implies docility and black men are anything but docile. You are an idiot.



This is complete nonsense. Cacs don't want their women with black men; they consider anyone mixed with black to be inferior and consider white women with black men to be under nikka's control. When they have a black wench like you, they consider you to be under their control. THAT is why they are OK with not letting black women with white women but are alright with vice versa. because controllin black wench c00ns is just a testament to white supremacy.That is how they see it and have ALWAYS seen it.

Many biracials have black partners and the white man wins nothing through it. There are legions of cacs whose very worse nightmare is that their daughter ends up with a black man; that is why they have railed against it for 300 years. You are living in a fantasy which does not conform to the real world, as the behavior of cacs note.

You are babbling and have not discredited a single statement in my post.

The c00ning of black men who chase after the white man's castoffs is no secret to anyone. These Bed Bucks™ shuck and jive even for blatantly RACIST, fat, greasy STD ridden white women and it is an embarrassment to ALL Black people.

 

[RAX 010]

Fear of the Black D!ck

 

[GiGi]

This is a consequence of advanced age and wealth in BW/WM couples. Older and richer couples divorce less, especially when they marry later. In normal society, blacks and whites marry at far younger ages to their own groups respectively, which pushes down the average age and the average wealth (as well as education). So the "low divorate rate" for BW/WM couples is merely a trick of the numbers. It is most likely a function of 1) low sample size and 2) variables like older average marrying age, wealth, education, etc (which only matter b/c the number is so low in teh first place). If you control for later marrying age, wealth and education, the divorce rate for white married couples will fall as well.

None of this discredits the fact that marriages been WM/BW are more stable. Even the marriages between BM/BW are more stable than BM/WW marriages.

So what are the "trick of the numbers" for the HIGHEST divorce rate that exists between Black men and White women.

 

[Deetee]

And how many PAWGing Bed Bucks™ have you negged? No need to answer hypocrite.

I call out nikkas that c00n on here all the time check some of my posts. You're a broad so i'ma attack ur c00nery harder with a neg. Deal with it

 

[Deetee]

The "low divorce rate" is just a trick of the numbers. In truth, it is low sample size, advanced marrying age, corresponding wealth which account for the low marriage rate in BW/WM couples. These variables lower the divorce rate for every couple, it's just that all other couples are more evenly distributed across the population, whereas the BW/WM is not. Older people and richer people get divorced less in general (younger-married and poorer people get divorced more).

Let me explain: in normal society, blacks and whites marry at far younger ages to their own groups respectively, which pushes down the average age and the average wealth (as well as education) down relative to the BW/WM. The normal black and white marriage population is "representative" of the groups, while far more rare (like BW/WM) is not. So the "low divorce rate" for BW/WM couples is merely a trick of the numbers. It is most likely a function of 1) low sample size and 2) variables like older average marrying age, wealth, education, etc (which only matter b/c the number is so low in the first place). If you control for older marrying age, wealth and education for white couples (for example), the divorce rate for wealthier white couples (that married later) undoubtedly falls, which makes the case. As such the BW/WM marriage rate isn't "real".

Don't let the LipStickAlley weirdos on here find this out tho

 

[GiGi]

I call out nikkas that c00n on here all the time check some of my posts. You're a broad so i'ma attack ur c00nery harder with a neg. Deal with it

That makes absolutely no sense but Bed Bucks™ never do...so carry on.