Why didn't Mike Tyson change his style?

Renzo

All Star
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
2,425
Reputation
400
Daps
7,816
Reppin
NULL
He did change his style, he got away from being elusive with otherworldly defense and became a head hunter right after firing his old team. He still was the best fighter in the world up til prison with Rich Giachetti modifying him somewhat but post prison he had regressed so much it was like a watching a totally different fighter. He lost his great foot work and most importantly his timing. He never got it back. His career was effectively over when he was left to rot away in jail for almost 4 years.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,038
Reputation
7,975
Daps
99,727
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
After the joke of a heavyweight of Parker Vs Fury last week I have gone back and been watching a lot of old heavyweight fighters. And something I noticed that I never quite caught in to in the past (obviously being more knowledgable on boxing now) is the flaw in Tysons technique. Now first of all let me start by saying his technique is a beautiful thing and is an amazing thing to watch it incorporated in fights. The thing with it though is it's based entirely on mobility and reflex speed, the style is clearly suited to a younger guy and even then it's dangerous. The style I am talking about is his bobbing and weaving style which he used non stop as his defense. When he was younger he had the stamina to pull it off and even then he was still in danger of taking shots to the face. He was so brilliant though with the style that in his younger days he would cut the ring off so quickly with that style and lay you out fast before you could counter. I noticed in his older days he was still trying to use the same style (Tyson vs Lewis), why didn't his trainers advise him to switch it up and change his defensive style? To me it seems like that style was a double edged sword and as he got older and slower he should have brought other styles in though. This man is a legend and one of the best he just had a flawed style but as a specimen he was on another level able to cut of the ring from guys much taller than him with a clear reach advantage.:wow:
you can't change a player's game in the 9th inning

tyson was washed by that time... you get about 3-4 months training in. there was no way he was going to unlearn something he knew for 10-15 years... and suddenly put in place, a totally different gameplan, in 3-4 months... especially against a fighter who was sticking to his style, the one he trained for for 10-15 years as well
 

Jack Skellington

yes indeed family
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,768
Reputation
0
Daps
6,413
Reppin
Halloween Town
Floyd pattwrson also had back problems from the bobbing and weaving style that cus damato taught. It's an obsolete boxing style. You are too squared up. You have to have some physical gifts to use that style and get to the top level. Patterson was also very fast for a heavyweight and had a big left hook.

By the time the Lewis fight came around Tyson didn't give a fukk about boxing he was just in it for the payday. Even long before that boxing was secondary for Tyson. The kind of life he was living and the money he made how could he stay dedicated to boxing? Particularly as the head case he was and his mentor dying. Cus was the only one who could keep him on track. The fact Tyson was able to do what he did shows what a physical freak he was because by 1990 boxing was an afterthought for him and he never regained that passion for the sport.




:wow:
 

The Amerikkkan Idol

The Amerikkkan Nightmare
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
13,952
Reputation
3,701
Daps
37,478
If you really think about it it's impressive that Tyson was able to reclaim two of the three belts within a year of getting out of prison with his diminished skills

I love MIke, but Bruce Seldon took a dive, bruh.
 
Top