why do cac's keep saying "Nelson Mandela is a terrorist?"

[kp404]

The Natives were there before the Europeans but there were no "countries". So the Natives wrote the United States Constitution?

Oh my lordy lord lord.....

 

[Nomad1]

If you are asking me to deny the crimes of British Colonialism then i clearly will not do that, but there were no "countries" when the English and French arrived, that is left wing academic fluff.

It's hilarious how this board goes crazy for the "Moors" (which was North African Colonialism) of Mediterranean Europeans - oh we brought them algebra and showers! You guys love Ottoman and African Colonialism but hate call the European man evil when he does the same thing. It's either all or nothing. And if you love Mandela, then you can't get made at the Crusaders or Conquistadors for taking back demographic and democratic control of their lands.

That shyt wasn't just British colonialism...it was EUROPEAN colonialism . Even though they were not countries when they where stolen or colonized they were still lands that native people where making a living. And if the UK, Norway, Sweden, etc don't want immigrants then they should make immigration reforms . You're acting like immigrants are forcibly taking their land and power when clearly they're not. Now have a seat bytch nikka.

 

[TTT]

He was a communist and he started the ANC which was a terrorist organization. ANC is famous for rubbernecking political opponents and dissenters. The ANC's past has legitimized the current genocide of Afrikaners. (http://www.genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html). However, i understand taking those actions under a tyrannical Apartheid rule. I understand why people love Mandela but he does have an ugly past that is clearly hidden by the MSM.

The only thing i ask people to remember is, when Europeans finally get tired of being displaced and losing democratic control in their countries, that you don't go into the typical hysterics of "evil racist cacs" "the white man is evil" etc, etc. I hope you give them the same consideration to the Europeans as you give Mandela for wanting to take back democratic control of their country.

That genocide watch website is not exactly credible and they make outlandish statements. There is no genocide of Afrikaners , its just an overreaction to farm murders and feeds into the hysteria that was common among their community and used to legitimizing their hold on power.It is simply an extension of what the Nats called Swaart Gevar or the black threat that they used to maintain their state of emergency and crackdowns in townships. They even said there would be a slaughter of whites immediately after Mandela dies and circulated documents to that effect. The charge of him being a communist is irrelevant given that they were the only ones willing to give aid to anti-colonial struggles when countries like Israel were helping the Apartheid regimes with nuclear technology and others in the West praising the Apartheid Government and calling them friends.

 

[Nomad1]

Are you serious? So because in your opinion there weren't "countries" in a European sense what? That makes the world Europe's?

The audacity of this nikka . Those lands still had some sort of social and economic structure so I don't know what this nikka is talking about......

 

[godkiller]

Justified murder, is still murder, not sure what you are saying exactly?

Justified murder is called a killing, not a murder. Killing or the threat of death is necessary to maintain and enforce peace. Killing in war is justified as such. Ideally we would like not to ever kill but when an individual, group or party insist on stealing, murdering, toturing, etc and refuse to listen to reason, you have every right to send them to hell. This is what all nations and peoples do in time. Everyone knows that people will fight for their freedom and sovereingty, as well as die for it. That is why nation states insist on having such powerful militaries: to force their tyranny and to protect themselves from others'.

If they call him a terrorist, and you say it was justified, that at best makes him a justified terrorist

I said that since all nations have fighting forces to defend their inalienable rights of freedom, self-interest and sovereinty, all nations are de facto terrorist organizations. All militaries have committed and will commit egregious wrongs in fighting to protect their nation. By default they are all terrorists. And since you were once military, you were one too.

 

[Odyssey]

History isn't your strong suit, or is that what they told you your associates was in?

I am simply applying the same logic that blacks use for themselves and applying

Are you serious? So because in your opinion there weren't "countries" in a European sense what? That makes the world Europe's?

No, it's called Colonialism, and i haven't defended that. The world is no less European than the African/Arab Moors you guys love to blow, who were colonizing and subjugating the Portuguese, Italians and Spanish to Muslim/African rule. Or, you know, The Ottoman Empire(which is one of the largest and longest running colonial powers in world history) who brutalized slavs and pretty much everyone they got their hands on. Don't worry though it's typical of Anti-Whites to ignore everyone else's history but blames Euro's for everything.

Games blacks play?
Games muslims play?

 

[Nomad1]

I am simply applying the same logic that blacks use for themselves and applying


No, it's called Colonialism, and i haven't defended that. The world is no less European than the African/Arab Moors you guys love to blow, who were colonizing and subjugating the Portuguese, Italians and Spanish to Muslim/African rule. Or, you know, The Ottoman Empire(which is one of the largest and longest running colonial powers in world history) who brutalized slavs and pretty much everyone they got their hands on. Don't worry though it's typical of Anti-Whites to ignore everyone else's history but blames Euro's for everything.

Games blacks play?
Games muslims play?

Fine the Ottoman empire is the same shyt as the European imperialistic practise. You happy now cac?

 

[godkiller]

No, it's called Colonialism, and i haven't defended that. The world is no less European than the African/Arab Moors you guys love to blow, who were colonizing and subjugating the Portuguese, Italians and Spanish to Muslim/African rule. Or, you know, The Ottoman Empire(which is one of the largest and longest running colonial powers in world history) who brutalized slavs and pretty much everyone they got their hands on. Don't worry though it's typical of Anti-Whites to ignore everyone else's history but blames Euro's for everything.

Games blacks play?
Games muslims play?

Moors were Berbers and no one says what the Moors or Ottomans did was right. That aside, this does not justify Europeans' colonialism. There is no justification for such, ever. Your ridiculous videos anti-white rhetoric nonsense will not sway minds here. Land belongs to the natives to do whatever it is they want with it. Cacs have no homeland but Europe and no rights but those they can force others to protect. Europe feeds on the wrongs of the past so why should a non-white hold it as sacred?

 

[Odyssey]

That shyt wasn't just British colonialism...it was EUROPEAN colonialism . Even though they were not countries when they where stolen or colonized they were still lands that native people where making a living. And if the UK, Norway, Sweden, etc don't want immigrants then they should make immigration reforms . You're acting like immigrants are forcibly taking their land and power when clearly they're not. Now have a seat bytch nikka.

They are, current European immigration is soft colonialism.

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

basically nelson mandela defended his people who were treated unfairly...

 

[Odyssey]

Fine the Ottoman empire is the same shyt as the European imperialistic practise. You happy now cac?

Glad you decided not to be anti-white for 10 secs.

 

[88m3]

You're as ignorant as kingsmen. Which flyover state did you grow up in? Your response is "no it's colonialism"? And? Can you make a logical argument in defense of the nonsense you've spewed?

 

[Nomad1]

They are, current European immigration is soft colonialism.

Immigration is not soft colonialism. Immigrants are not establishing any political control in the country they immigrate to and they are not exploting the country's economic value as well. So shut up with your stupidity.

 

[Odyssey]

That shyt wasn't just British colonialism...it was EUROPEAN colonialism . Even though they were not countries when they where stolen or colonized they were still lands that native people where making a living. And if the UK, Norway, Sweden, etc don't want immigrants then they should make immigration reforms . You're acting like immigrants are forcibly taking their land and power when clearly they're not. Now have a seat bytch nikka.

Oh, and it's NOT European Colonialism. What Colonial history does Norway have?

I am the one who doesn't know about history

 

[DEAD7]

By default they are all terrorists. And since you were once military, you were one too.

America engages in lots of terrorist activity, ill never deny that.

The bombings that took place killed innocent people...he plead guilty to this much.Calling it justified(subjective), doesn't make it right or any less detestable.