MindOverMatter
Pro
lol people are so easily manipulated if you appeal to their ego...
lol people are so easily manipulated if you appeal to their ego...
Basically she's saying that men fall in love with a woman's character while women fall in love with the perks of a relationship and what a man can financially do for her.
When those perks are gone and the relationship isnt as exciting, the love she had for that man is gone too.
That was just me trying to sum up what she said. Never said I agreed with her 100 percent.I know plenty of women in relationships and marriages where the men aren’t providing those financial perks, or that arent romantic. Way too generalized. I do agree with the premise that men and women love differently, not necessarily the idea that men love deeper though. but overall nah don’t agree with that summary if that’s what she’s saying. I sometimes think humans are too selfish too truly love another person—unconditionally that is-except when it comes to their children—in a lot of cases. Obviously there are those who don’t fit that, but humans fall in and out of love often, it takes work for many to maintain it, even then it can be trying on both parties to just do it freely, no matter what the person does...
That was just me trying to sum up what she said. Never said I agreed with her 100 percent.
I think shes right about how women love but wrong about how men love.
Not all women, but a large amount of them do from my experience. Especially this new generation of women.I know, it wasn’t said by you. I disagreed with the tweeter. You really think that’s how women love, breh?
I almost completely disagree with her take on this matter. To say men love more deeply than women is almost insane when speaking in general from my experience. We also love very differently which is a key factor. Men are recievers and men are the output,women don't neccesarily love you for romance or perks. Most of the women I've known to love the deepest recieved no perks,very little effort and certainly no romance. Women love you for what you are putting into them,whether it be love,laughter,teaching,dividends,and last but not least the dikk. Think of women as an empty vessel that loves you for the way you fill them up. Once you have nothing more to teach,can't show them you love them any harder,your jokes are old and stale,she's bored with being spoiled,and even the sex has gotten tired. At that point that woman will be looking to be filled. Doesn't matter how much you filled her with and invested in her,you may have nothing new left to deposit in her,but the woman STILL needs to be filled in the way that she likes to be filled. Some women will prefer one more than the other,but most need all in some capacity.
Now to men,I don't think men love more deeply then women. As the filler,men love women like we love a memory card that we saved all our franchise mode information into. Like we loved that ipod that we saved all of our gigabytes of music on. So we actually love women for their capacity to love what we installed in them,and her abiility to give it back to us. So when you think of it like that,men actually love women deeply because we love ourselves and our "creation".
Now you have to make it relevant to the time we are in. And we are in a time where men are not required to put very much of ourselves into a woman to fukk or to be with her. As well as women are more resistant to being filled. Lets just put it this way,no man is tripping off losing a memory card that only had 200MB of info.
Both ways of loving have a mechanism for both partys to get bored with their creation,as well as their "creator"![]()
Yeah that part didnt bode well with me. smhAnd the woman said some good stuff but then started babbling some nonsense. Talking about how women got plenty options without adding the context that the vast majority of those options are dudes who just want to plow her out and talking about a man's love is some simp ass dude waiting for his turn. Smh.
Like I said most of those options are dudes who just want to plow her out. Not guys who would even consider taking the female seriously enough to be with them past a year or even for marriage. So, the idea that a long term serious relationship should be thrown aside just because of no ring and how she got these "options" is silly as hell and setting women up to throw away good relationships away for nothing.She said that in the context of a woman staying with a man for 10 years without marriage. She's saying that women have no one to blame but themselves if they find themselves in a relationship for years and marriage isnt on the table cause women have options and dont have to stay with a dude that wont marry them.