WHY DO PEOPLE STILL DENY HUMANS ARE ANIMALS...?

Drip Bayless

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
13,080
Reputation
2,927
Daps
56,382
Physicist David Bohm, in his plasma experiments, at the Berkeley Radiation Laboratory, Bohm found that individual electrons act as part of an interconnected whole. In plasma, the gaseous electrons more or less assume the nature of a self-regulating organism, as if they were inherently intelligent.

This scientific discovery of Non-Locality, the wave/particle duality, meant that everything is joined or connected together. Space and time is composed of the same essence as matter. Bohm found this to be a conscious atomic sea and extending out from this sub-atomic reality, all of material creation may also be said to be conscious. Since all matter and events interact with each other, time (past, present, future) along with space and distance, all is relative to the observer and operate as one under the law of Non-Locality.

"A principle related to nonlocality is called Bell's Theorem. This is a quantum physics law that says that once connected, objects affect one another forever no matter where they are. Following the principle of Bell's Theorem...an invisible stream of energy will always connect any two objects that have been connected in any way in the past."

This meant that everything is connected to everything else and that physical reality is BOTH waves and a particles. This model birthed the "holographic universe" idea, the powerful conscious energy that the whole can invariably be found in the tiniest particles: an atom of a blade of grass to the most distance galaxies. The building blocks of atoms are merely, "parcels of compressed energy, packed and patterned according to certain mathematical formulae."


I don't take anyone's word as law, but if I provide you theories that go against what you believe you can say, "I'm not going to take their word as law" to anything. So what would you take as law considering everything in the world is just the creation or thought of another human being? Or do you only find science that you agree with and take that as law?
You haven't quoted a single theory. You quoted an experiment and as soon as he mentioned conscious energy it delved into the realm of pseudoscience. But I'm open minded I'll look into it and report back to you. As for your other point no, there is more than words and opinions, the scientific method produces testable evidence. I take nothing as law, I only accept conclusions that are repeatedly verified experimentally or eventually disproven
 
Last edited:
Top