there was an episode of miami vice where Crockett and Tubbs are investigating the Crayon Killer
As they explore the underbelly of miami,,
they find this little hooker/dancer who just is so sad
Tubbs takes her in like a stray cat and attempts to save her
of course the teenager wants to throw him the p*ssy in appreciation
But he's like

. (1) you are underage and (2) I'm trying to save you from the wolves
And it's a good thing he took the high road..
Cuz when he wakes up, she has handcuffed him to the bed and has his gun and Tubbs is like
Oh shyt this girl is the Crayon Killer 
She takes off her robe and delivers this creepy soliloquy ending with "I love you, Ricardo"
Then she spares his life as she kills herself
...whew, close call for Rico tubbs
Anyway
,that's an episode of a corny 80s tv show
But what captures my attention, as a theoretical dramatic question
Is.. Like Rico tubbs, I have had success with the ladies
But I also have some criteria and standards for my actions
The crayon killer is very attractive
But let's take away the underage and prostitute aspects
Would I sleep with a woman who was soliciting me out of desperation or coersion?
regardless of her attractiveness and her insistence that I fukk her,
It's like ???
Rico was fighting his urges.. And he did the right thing (and got to live

But real life is not so easy
who am I to classify a woman as desperate or being coerced..??
Society would grind to a halt if we assessed the "fairness" of each exchange
Itd be stupid to sit there celibate because I didn't want to potentially damage a woman
But like the Rico Tubbs dilemma
How much am I responsible for females short term desires?
And if the next man down the pecking order would lunge at the chance.. And clumsily do max damage.. What is the point of me going out of the way to avoid inflicting minimal damage??