Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
But yet, I still see men trying to shame other men who refuse to be the sole breadwinner in a marriage or committed marriage-like relationship 
Why does it seem common for women to be disgusted @ the idea of supporting a man financially
- Thread starter Scustin Bieburr
- Start date
I had this conversation with my old female roommate, but I can't remember the exact wording we boiled things down to.
Basically, though, it has to do with how their minds have evolved to handle pregnancy and birth.
Inherently, women "provide" nurture and care for what they carry and then birth from their womb (and by extension, other wombs by way of adoption, etc.) through offspring's most vulnerable years.
A woman "supporting a man financially" elicits the opposite chemical reaction, as her brain associates said man's ability to survive without her with the survival ability of a child without its mother. On top of that, there's no biologically empathetic connection, as "her man" didn't come from her womb.
Basically, though, it has to do with how their minds have evolved to handle pregnancy and birth.
Inherently, women "provide" nurture and care for what they carry and then birth from their womb (and by extension, other wombs by way of adoption, etc.) through offspring's most vulnerable years.
A woman "supporting a man financially" elicits the opposite chemical reaction, as her brain associates said man's ability to survive without her with the survival ability of a child without its mother. On top of that, there's no biologically empathetic connection, as "her man" didn't come from her womb.
Because it's the natural order, women bamboozled themselves
This.
Woman are survivalist. They naturally don't respect people who can't survive better than them. They will care for them, even help at times but never respect/submit.
Another example of this is women praising single pregnant mothers who still work 7-8 months in as strong. But if she's married in the same situation calling her husband weak for allowing his wife to still work.
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
The hell going on in this thread? 
Action Mike
All praise..
Who would want that anyway?
Providing financially for someone is considered a masculine trait.
Women - despite social progressivism - are still mostly attracted to masculine traits in men, and men are primarily attracted to feminine traits in women.
A woman financially providing for a man doesn't sit right with her because her man is technically in the submissive position while she is dominant; it feels wrong. It's similar to how men feel emasculated when doing feminine things. (we only shyt on men for this though calling it "fragile masculinity", but that's a convo for another day.)
It's the same reason why most women are unattracted to (and sometime grow to resent) men that are not assertive, confident, tall, strong, dominant, emotionally mature, stoic, etc. Because those are masculine traits.
Women - despite social progressivism - are still mostly attracted to masculine traits in men, and men are primarily attracted to feminine traits in women.
A woman financially providing for a man doesn't sit right with her because her man is technically in the submissive position while she is dominant; it feels wrong. It's similar to how men feel emasculated when doing feminine things. (we only shyt on men for this though calling it "fragile masculinity", but that's a convo for another day.)
It's the same reason why most women are unattracted to (and sometime grow to resent) men that are not assertive, confident, tall, strong, dominant, emotionally mature, stoic, etc. Because those are masculine traits.
Honestly y'all care far too much about women and their wants and that's part of the problem. I have much more free time now that II don't pursue women. If they come great we can have fun but they are an accessory not a necessity
The Fade
I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Men marrying wealthier women for jumpstart wealth is not new
cacs do it all the time. Washington did it, pirates did it, regular middle class do it. Lot of household names did it. Cacs in Latin America did it, which partly why they run the shyt.
as long as you gotta plan who cares,
cacs do it all the time. Washington did it, pirates did it, regular middle class do it. Lot of household names did it. Cacs in Latin America did it, which partly why they run the shyt.
as long as you gotta plan who cares,
Because white media throughout history told them a man need to be the ones who need to be the ones to be financially supportive
Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
That's a solid explanation, but as you can see this translates to women trying harder to get men who are financially superior to them rather than on their level or lower.
So why am I seeing men roasting brehs who aren't interested in supporting an adult child in their house
That's a solid argument.
It does make me wonder though, why do we have men who are willing to take in an overgrown child? At least 80% of us know how to pick up after ourselves and keep our homes in order, know how to cook out own meals and can do so easily with things like multicookers. Laundry is a breeze with machines, so what do you gain by allowing a woman into your home who isn't paying a minimum of 40% for the expenses in the home?
Worse yet, why are there men who are out here making fun of men who demand that the woman at least contribute significantly to the finances? It feels like the standards we are expected to have comes down to "look good, don't argue with me and have sex when I want" whereas women demand far more to the point where negus like Kevin samuels can build a career off reminding them to be realistic about their expectations
MischievousMonkey
Gor bu dëgër
Nature 
Nurture
No one really knows
NurtureNo one really knows
MajesticLion
Veteran
Regularly
scheduled
programming
scheduled
programming