Why does the WWE still need 2 world championships?

[Mike the Executioner]

They don't know how to book the roster with one title, they don't know how to book the roster with two titles. I don't see why it matters so much.

Just be happy this isn't 2007 and the ECW Championship isn't around anymore. Half the time, they didn't know whether it was a world title or a secondary title. Having Chavo Guerrero enter the Rumble as champion, no title defenses at WrestleMania, except for the one match that lasted eight seconds.

 

[NoMorePie]

I wonder if yall liked seeing a wwe title and a world title in the 2000s

 

[momma]

They don't know how to book the roster with one title, they don't know how to book the roster with two titles. I don't see why it matters so much.

I bring this up in a hypothetical world where shyt is still logical and fun

 

[papertrail08]

Two World Titles and Money In The Bank have devalued the prestige of being a World Champion so much over the years. You can't even use "the roster is too big" excuse because the World Titles always go to the same wrestlers and when we do see a new champion, it does nothing for their career.

In fact, I hate the Brand Split in general. They have 3 Hours of RAW and 2 Hours of SmackDown to fill every week. You mean to tell me that they can't utilize their entire roster with 5 Hours of Television without splitting them up?

The only Brand Split should be WWE and NXT, that's it. Survivor Series last year made it pretty obvious.

 

[Mr. Brown]

I wish they'd bring back the big gold belt

 

[Amare's Right Hook]

Careful that Vince doesn't follow in UFC and boxing footsteps and creates a championship for each weight class.

Do it, Vince