Why does this gibberish cost $110 million

Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
45,999
Reputation
-34,966
Daps
250,914
400x-1.jpg
 

Michael's Black Son

Blanket Jackson
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
55,428
Reputation
16,845
Daps
241,753
Reppin
New York City & Neverland Ranch
The modern art world has been on the hypebeast wave for at least 70 years. They find some artists to build up, fund them and give them a platform just so they can say “you ain’t up on this”

Look up the story of the MOMA art museum here in NY. A group of rich ass women basically used some of their rich husbands money to support artists they fukked with and then build a museum around that. It’s hype. And it’s not hard to replicate as long as you follow through with constantly convincing people the shyt is dope
 

GPBear

The Tape Crusader
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Messages
20,111
Reputation
4,784
Daps
67,423
Reppin
Bay-to-PDX
People used to attack Monets with umbrellas, people who don’t understand art are always looking to attack it. And are more focused on monetary value than anything else.

You can’t honestly expect an answer to your leading question. There’s no formula. Certain materials + Compositional elements = X amount of money. Doesn’t work that way.

You just wanted to shyt talk something you resented and didn’t understand. And criticizing things because you don’t understand them is a hallmark of a closed mind
 

GPBear

The Tape Crusader
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Messages
20,111
Reputation
4,784
Daps
67,423
Reppin
Bay-to-PDX
unfortunately he n ever profited to this level while he was alive. Now cacs are profiting millions flipping his work
Obviously prices of an artists work go up after their death because there won’t be any more created, but Basquiat got to make films, exhibited in the major art Meccas of the world, and collaborated heavily with his artistic idols like Andy Warhol.
And he did this all by like 27. I’d consider all this pretty profitable. Especially in comparison to an artist like Van Gogh, who only sold one piece in his entire lifetime.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
45,999
Reputation
-34,966
Daps
250,914
People used to attack Monets with umbrellas, people who don’t understand art are always looking to attack it. And are more focused on monetary value than anything else.

You can’t honestly expect an answer to your leading question. There’s no formula. Certain materials + Compositional elements = X amount of money. Doesn’t work that way.

You just wanted to shyt talk something you resented and didn’t understand. And criticizing things because you don’t understand them is a hallmark of a closed mind


What is there to understand about this?

$11 million :gucci:


soupcan.jpg
 

GPBear

The Tape Crusader
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Messages
20,111
Reputation
4,784
Daps
67,423
Reppin
Bay-to-PDX
The modern art world has been on the hypebeast wave for at least 70 years. They find some artists to build up, fund them and give them a platform just so they can say “you ain’t up on this”

Look up the story of the MOMA art museum here in NY. A group of rich ass women basically used some of their rich husbands money to support artists they fukked with and then build a museum around that. It’s hype. And it’s not hard to replicate as long as you follow through with constantly convincing people the shyt is dope
You’re completely distorting the Basquiat narrative to serve your own (thinly veiled misogynist) outlook on the art world.
The art world didn’t find Basquiat. He went out of his way to position himself in the center of the artworld, and he had the genius level of talent and ability to do something about it. The art world at the time was a closed, sterile environment which wanted nothing to do with “street” artists. Basquiat purposefully sprayed his SAMO graffiti in neighborhoods like Soho, where the high end art gallery’s were, forcing the art world to notice him.
 
Top