*L*E*G*A*C*Y*
Done.
Do you think there's really any difference between cacs in the 1800s and cacs now?He was a cac in the mid 1800s breh.
I wouldn't be surprised if John Brown held some racist views.
Serious question.
My answer? There is NOT.
Do you think there's really any difference between cacs in the 1800s and cacs now?He was a cac in the mid 1800s breh.
I wouldn't be surprised if John Brown held some racist views.
Common Knowledge? Try walking up to the average Black man and woman and asking this, I guarantee you it wouldn't be common knowledge.
And I don't feel shyt for Ulysses Grant....he was an owner of slaves........like the majority of the presidents. All devils who are resting in piss..



I always thought this was somewhat common knowledge. Here's a quote from Lincoln from the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
"I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My understanding is that I can just let her alone"
Though he also said
"I should like to know, if taking this old Declaration of Independence, which declares that all men are equal upon principle, and making exceptions to it, where will it stop? If one man says it does not mean a negro, why may not another man say it does not mean another man? If that declaration is not the truth, let us get this statute book in which we find it and tear it out.
Let us discard all this quibbling about this man and the other man—this race and that race and the other race being inferior, and therefore they must be placed in an inferior position, discarding our standard that we have left us. Let us discard all these things, and unite as one people throughout this land, until we shall once more stand up declaring that all men are created equal."

Just another thing missing from the Textbooks..............
Right as I always do....That being said......The fact that this is yet one of many early presidents that are revered as "heroic" and "freedom fighters" were nothing but inhumane racists, who's legacies have been "shined" up.
Same with Thomas Jefferson who was nothing but a slave owning pedophilic rapist, but is revered....people have to find out the hard way after they have "loved" them for years
Negroes need to see that ole Abe was a slave owning racist, who really wanted to get rid of Black people as fast as possible, but the narrative is he was the one that "granted our freedom"...oh how wonderful of him........![]()
In context, at that point, sending slaves 'back to Africa' wouldn't be a negative thing. Their generation were not that far removed from Africa.

It really wouldn't be "getting away" with it because Lincoln saw Colonization as a voluntary option for freed slaves as he didn't believe racial harmony in the US was possible and that they weren't actual citizen's in the normal sense just aliens in a land that they were forced into and that they would probably want to go back "home".Another thing that kills me is that if Lincoln wasnt assassinated he might have gotten away with it, and it was white people who kept us here inadvertently...![]()
That's actually correct. Lincoln always believed that Blacks were inferior biologically, but he did attempt to think about keeping us here at the very tail end; his last few months are very complex as he wrestled with colonization and suffrage. Good post homie.It really wouldn't be "getting away" with it because Lincoln saw Colonization as a voluntary option for freed slaves as he didn't believe racial harmony in the US was possible and that they weren't actual citizen's in the normal sense just aliens in a land that they were forced into and that they would probably want to go back "home".
But by the end of his presidency Lincoln's views on colonization had cooled down a lot and he was flirting with the idea of granting limited suffrage to blacks and that was the last speech he gave before he was killed.
At least that's what I remember.