
Drill betterAnte up and drill are not the same. The mental gymnastics some of you perform in defense of this garbage is![]()

Ante up is a song about robbing kidnapping and killing (black) people.Ante up and drill are not the same. The mental gymnastics some of you perform in defense of this garbage is![]()
Sounds like drill rap to me.It's less about the music and more about how society treats and views young black males. The music may manipulate them but it is only able to do so due to how things are. Removing the music will just make it easier for something else to take its place and do the same job, be it video games, comics, or any other outlet of expression. Hell, lucid dreaming may give way to the same response. It honestly comes down to how young black males are treated. If treated better, I honestly think the music would have little effect outside of embarrassing clothing choices or something more benign.
Exactly...how many of us were listening to "gangsta rap" back in the 90's. For me I knew it was entertainment or a life I never wanted to live but enjoyed listening to. Similar to violent moviesHumans have always been into bloodsport. Drill is just an evolution of that.
The problem here is that you're working from an assumption and acting like it is fact. If the music is the cause, explain the mechanism and explain why many other black males, as well as non-black males aren't effected to such a degree. Explain why and how, if there are levels to it, such levels actually occur. If we are to treat this as science then we should approach it as such. This is what bothers me. All I am seeing is a sundry of correlations and people affixing causation that in itself is damning since, if one continues down the line of assumptions, it paints those effected by such music as inherently inferior, or dare I say, genetically so. I don't believe that which is why I feel it is due in part to social issues and how black males are regarded and treated as a whole. This makes more sense.Music that centers around the death of Black males is always going to have an effect on Black males, the fact that you can't readily identify what those effects are in yourself is not the same thing as them not being present.
The problem here is that you're working from an assumption and acting like it is fact. If the music is the cause, explain the mechanism and explain why many other black males, as well as non-black males aren't effected to such a degree. Explain why and how, if there are levels to it, such levels actually occur. If we are to treat this as science then we should approach it as such. This is what bothers me. All I am seeing is a sundry of correlations and people affixing causation that in itself is damning since, if one continues down the line of assumptions, it paints those effected by such music as inherently inferior, or dare I say, genetically so. I don't believe that which is why I feel it is due in part to social issues and how black males are regarded and treated as a whole. This makes more sense.
Consider, what is more powerful: the lyrics, the beats, or the video? What role does each play in this? Is this the same for everyone? This is what I'm talking about. From another perspective, if I were root cause analysis for this, who would it go? That's my issue. I haven't seen a convincing breakdown of the technical merits of this issue. I don't like drill music so I would not mind to see it go but at the same time, this does not fix the root of the problem, it simply passes blame.