ok, let's first establish how much revenue you think it would take to, let's say prevent the inner cities of the 90's fromIf the city, state, and fed government don't have ample tax revenue how do you expect these programs to exist?
and establish some modicum of prosperity and let's say you also give us some logical or maybe even historical basis for your numberreaching the point of noreturn.
this is so vague, disconnected and misinformed, it's essentially a cacophony of the talking points the tv done taught youIt's not just about drugs, its about violence, homelessness, the erosion of tax base, blighted neighborhoods and the list goes on.
I feel bad for you
so let me help
it's Primarily and initially about housing
it's about institutional racist decisions AND LAWS/ORDINANCES enacted and ignored (in the latter I refer to the FHA) to keep blacks segregated and out of home ownership, decent neighborhoods and instead funnel them into concentration camps y'all call projects and ghettos. plain and simple; this was orchestrated fully by the gov and local interests, throughout the 60's and 70's. The inner city was created and blacks were forced into them.
nonsense, There is plenty of good information about the civil rights movements of the last 50 years that a Martian could land here today and, with proper review, have good grip on these matters.If you don't have any experience with the state of things how can you judge them?
If I lived in suburbia or and affluent area how can appreciate how bad things were for the life of city people in this period? I honestly don't think someone can.
this could achieve the level of circular reasoning. if- you would include the history of slums and African AmericansI frankly don't think an organic change would have resulted in the turnaround in affected communities that we currently have today. In NYC alone in the past the majority of neighborhoods were essentially slums.
Last edited:

........................................got homie in the witness protection program


Hillary