Why Hillary Clinton Won’t Release Her Goldman Sachs Transcripts

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
21,207
Reputation
5,577
Daps
91,035
Reppin
The Arsenal
No they aren't and that's some fukked up spinning too. You would not be so generous if Obama was White. Just admit it, ya'll just just as much simping as the women for Hillary.

I'm HUMBLE. I will admit when I'm wrong, easily and quickly. But I am not 100% wrong though. He had a super majority, but he wasn't leader enough to get sit passed.

My typo'd question was asking what supermajority did George W. Bush have when he got his tax cuts passed and the Iraq war? How many Democrats did you see cross over?

So I guess James Tomey, director of the FBI, who forbid police cameras is this "republican that the party can't stand" either huh? The only moderates I see on that list are Chuck Hagel and Judd Gregg, everyone else would likely not even let your Black ass be their valet. Obama is a moderate Republican passing moderate Republican policies. Admit it and stop trying to cape.

Back to how you took my typo's, which are my fault. What happened to the Bush tax cuts under Obama?? Yeah, he made them permanent after running against them. What happened in Iraq? Oh yeah, he promised to leave and then tried to amend Bush's Status of Forces agreement.

But I know you're gonna have weak ass excuses for all of that too
you can talk about typos all you want, my post was addressing what you wrote so you basically wasted my time. it's much easier to get politicians to support a tax cut because even democrats believe in giving the middle class a tax break. obama didn't campaign on raising taxes on everyone, only on the rich (the top rate). when the bush tax cuts were about to expire two campaign promises were at play for obama: 1) raising the top tax rate back to the clinton levels 39.6% 2) not raising taxes on the middle class. if he just let the bush tax cut expire and not negotiate with republicans he would be breaking promise #2 which encompasses a lot more people than the first group. so instead of the top tax bracket being 39.6% for a family making 288k like it was in clinton's last year, the 39.6% bracket is now for a family making 464k. so taxes did go up on the rich. when compromise is necessary this is what happens. this is an example of an ok compromise though.

as for democrats joining republicans in being for the iraq war and that's somehow proof that bush showed something obama isn't in getting that cross party support. that's pretty damn naive. were you an adult in 2001-04 or did you just get into politics in 2008? do you know what % of americans supported that foolish war? if you weren't for war you were labeled anti-american. a georgia senator who lost his fukking legs in vietnam was voted out for not being sufficiently patriotic. any president could gin up support for war in that climate.

james tomey can't forbid police cameras. that's police dept policy. he's a connecticut republican and someone who had the confirmation votes.

and if hagel is a moderate republican then so is lahood and gates. and those ambassador positions don't really register on the outrage meter for even the most rabid democrat.
 

MrSinnister

Delete account when possible.
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Messages
5,323
Reputation
325
Daps
6,832
you can talk about typos all you want, my post was addressing what you wrote so you basically wasted my time. it's much easier to get politicians to support a tax cut because even democrats believe in giving the middle class a tax break. obama didn't campaign on raising taxes on everyone, only on the rich (the top rate). when the bush tax cuts were about to expire two campaign promises were at play for obama: 1) raising the top tax rate back to the clinton levels 39.6% 2) not raising taxes on the middle class. if he just let the bush tax cut expire and not negotiate with republicans he would be breaking promise #2 which encompasses a lot more people than the first group. so instead of the top tax bracket being 39.6% for a family making 288k like it was in clinton's last year, the 39.6% bracket is now for a family making 464k. so taxes did go up on the rich. when compromise is necessary this is what happens. this is an example of an ok compromise though.

as for democrats joining republicans in being for the iraq war and that's somehow proof that bush showed something obama isn't in getting that cross party support. that's pretty damn naive. were you an adult in 2001-04 or did you just get into politics in 2008? do you know what % of americans supported that foolish war? if you weren't for war you were labeled anti-american. a georgia senator who lost his fukking legs in vietnam was voted out for not being sufficiently patriotic. any president could gin up support for war in that climate.

james tomey can't forbid police cameras. that's police dept policy. he's a connecticut republican and someone who had the confirmation votes.

and if hagel is a moderate republican then so is lahood and gates. and those ambassador positions don't really register on the outrage meter for even the most rabid democrat.
You wasted my time caping. I already said my bad for the typk's but you think you're superior and shyt, when all you do is simp :pachaha:.

All that Michelin shyt you're doing would not be done for a White man. Ya'll claimed you loved him after the elite did, but all ya'll did was complain about Clinton until Lewinsky. I was a teen in the 90's, I was there. So don't talk down to me.

I saw the spin to the war, and how quick Hillary was to defend Bush's actions. It was like she had a vested interest in the war. Chuck Sumer was the same way. That was back in the days I watched hardball daily, and Democrats helped sell Bush's war. Yes, I do believe Obama lacks real leadership.

Anyway, that neither here nor there, Obama throws the game, constantly, because he is not feeling it. Tomey has no power over the police directly, but him publicly shunning the police camera plan and crying about officers in Chicago and nationwide refusing to do their job, stripped many parts of the Black Lives Matter argument. I know, he's appointed by Obama, so there's a logical out for that too :beli:, and Black Lives Matter is now somehow at fault for how an FBI director appointment by Obama, views the police.

You're making value judgments on the rest of his appointees that are just meant to be filabusters, as I know you don't believe that if you lived the the Bush Era like you've claimed.
 

Aufheben

All Star
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
1,753
Reputation
1,030
Daps
10,787
Reppin
Nowhere
this thread is a steaming pile of misinformation, ignorance and alarmist propaganda :scust:

glad i saved my time from going back and forth with you dummies :whew:
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,341
Reputation
1,355
Daps
13,430
Reppin
Harlem
Re-drawn districts or not, we can get Bernie and a Democratic congress into office if the people get out and vote, and there will be nothing the establishment can do about it.
 
Top