Why is thecoli so lurker friendly? Time to shut that steel curtain @cook

[Banned Account12]

IMO it would make them even more curios to join the site, plus if that @BrothaZay thread was 100% right major news outlets might already have accounts to just lurk the site and steal shyt... only way i can see this working out is if you have to have your account active and if you're not active for a few weeks they will disable your ability to view the forum.. and you must wait a few weeks(at most 2) to view this site again and if you keep on becoming inactive they will have to delete your account... and they should make account limits then if they do that

You should be a mod breh

 

[The D-List Vet]

Make it so that you have to be active with your post ,if not your account becomes locked. Also make it so that you need to verify a picture with the Adkins before you can sign up along with age. These young ones are popping up left and right and add nothing to the discussions we have here. Then there's the racist who sign up just to troll.

see you have a similar idea to me but @midwesthiphop going to ask you the same question... how will users not just find out that you need to just posters a certain number of times then lurk i might just think of something

 

[Nick Barnes]

y'all take this shyt way to serious.

Lurkers = traffic and ad revenue.

Why are people so against lurkers anyway? Who cares if people sign up.

 

[The D-List Vet]

You should be a mod breh

nah i dont have time for that i am busy with school currently... plus i rather be a regular posters

 

[EpicStoryTeller]

see you have a similar idea to me but @midwesthiphop going to ask you the same question... how will users not just find out that you need to just posters a cering number of times then lurk i might just think of something

Add in that they need to have a certain number of threads created too along with verifying a Facebook and or instagram? Harsh but the lurkers and trolls are getting out of hand

 

[EpicStoryTeller]

y'all take this shyt way to serious.

Lurkers = traffic and ad revenue.

Why are people so against lurkers anyway? Who cares if people sign up.

Lurker=white trolls, snitches, content stealers.

 

[Nick Barnes]

Y'all basically want another SOHH.

fukk that.

 

[The D-List Vet]

Add in that they need to have a certain number of threads created too along with verifying a Facebook and or instagram? Harsh but the lurkers and trolls are getting out of hand

but not everyone wants to share their personal info. and even if you just give it to the mods look at @chirs.b he was exposed with shyt ton of info even had mods come in there confirming his email he used to sign up etc etc

 

[Knuckles Red]

And while we're at it...why the fukk can't we have gifs for avis?!?!!?

 

[The D-List Vet]

Y'all basically want another SOHH.

fukk that.

i was not around for SOHH but main reason that shyt die was because the owners of that site did not give a fukk about the users and never really tried to fix shyt plus when that (website that will not be named) attacked and took over SOHH it was its downfall

 

[Auger]

Yes, we need cac filters

 

[Hi!]

i dont like this wench but @PeridotPuss already exposed you for having another accout anyway so @Klyk21 is not wrong on this

Link to that bullshyt

I think you got breh confused with @JordanwiththeWiz

 

[Another Man]

y'all take this shyt way to serious.

Lurkers = traffic and ad revenue.

Why are people so against lurkers anyway? Who cares if people sign up.

So you don't think it's a problem when you have people on here stealing material? Would that not take away traffic in the long run?

 

[The D-List Vet]

 

[JordanWearinThe45]

Got that link yet to my exposal?