It's not facts, it's your agenda.
Draymond was out and the Warriors were leading 3-1. Draymond came back when the Warriors were leading 3-2 out of 7. So Dray was back for 2 straight game but they still loss.
The Finals basically came down to ONE shot. ONE shot was all that separated both teams. Think about that for a second. The Cavs didn't win by being significantly more talented and they didn't win by playing significantly better. Here are the facts:
The Warriors were up 3-1 with all the main rotational players playing and healthy
The Cavs came back when Draymond was out in Game 5, Bogut hurting his back in Game 5 (the score was 67-64 when he left - do NOT say he wasn't an important factor because he was basically all the rim protection the Warriors had in that game. Not to mention we saw how cotdamn horrible Ezeli was when he had to start) and Iggy hurting his back in Game 6 and never recovered (you know the guy that was best at defending LeBron?).
All of those factors had an impact on the result of the Finals.
Love never played the finals the season Cavs lose and Kyrie played 1-2 games and never came back. You telling me Dray missing one game and Bogut missing 2 games is more important than Love missing all games and Kyrie missing 5 game? .
And Iggy's injury too.
I'm not saying either is more important, just that you can't pick and choose when to acknowledge injuries/fortunes to fit your agenda.