Why isn't anybody speaking about the fukked up challenge in the first quarter?
- Thread starter Ohene
- Start date
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6008403/jcatchery.0.gif)
You're not gonna win that challenge.
BLAZO da GAWD
Superstar
His hand was underneath the ball. I've seen that called as a catch before.
You're not gonna win that challenge.
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
i got up for a bit after i saw the replay figuring they'd overturn..
i didn't even realize they fukked it up until carolina won the second challenge and they didn't give them another one.
how the fukk was that not a catch?
Me too I went in the other room not trippin thinkin they'd over turn came back like
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
thts a catch, shyts clear as day
You're not gonna win that challenge.
To be honest that was the real play of the game. If thats a catch, Broncos don't score on that next play. That was a good catch.
True, but the movement of the ball after it hit the ground is what did him in. The argument was that he never truly maintained possession.
I posted that because it was said that it never touched the ground when it did.
Please screenshot when the ball hit the ground. It never hit the ground.
This is debatable now, but once you provide the screenshot it ends the debate
That is the point, if it is debatable it isn't "clear."
That is the point, if it is debatable it isn't "clear."
But that's why we can challenge plays
so please show me the concrete fukking proof that ball touched the ground and end the debate..
Calm down. I never said it was or wasn't a catch. I just posted that it hit the ground when some in the thread said it absolutely didn't. I may not have the best eyesight, but the nose of the ball sure looked liked the ground to me.
Like I said, the movement afterwards is probably what confirmed the ruling.
