Only if things don't go your way yeah. Redefine what words mean. Then you can make any argument dissolve into nonsense.
Why isn't/is science viewed as a miracle?
- Thread starter 88m3
- Start date
Only if things don't go your way yeah. Redefine what words mean. Then you can make any argument dissolve into nonsense.
IVS
Superstar
science is a contraction of gnosci and the term science stems from gnoscience, and co-gnoscience means "with knowing" and demonstrates a level of knowing and expertise. So science is not a miracle because science is based on the understanding and application of principles and the ability to reproduce similar results. Miracle is connected to the unknown, and is antagonistic to science. But something may remain miraculous until the process that produces such a miracle is known and the miracle can be reproduced regularly and there is a model for creating the conditions to produce the miraculous happening. After the experiments reproduce the expected results, and the experiment is modeled and tested, then the secret behind the miraculous is known, and therefore it has become science.
passenger77
Rookie
A miracle says by itself that something truly impossible for humans became possible.
And I don't talk about remedies for harsh health problems like cancer although that's welcome when true.
I talk about the Biblic level, 10 commandments, Lazarus resurrection, healed paralysed, red sea split...
So, science doesn't enter the category imo.
And I don't talk about remedies for harsh health problems like cancer although that's welcome when true.
I talk about the Biblic level, 10 commandments, Lazarus resurrection, healed paralysed, red sea split...
So, science doesn't enter the category imo.
so like i said. the only way you can have a discussion is on your terms using one piece of research material. Uhh OK.
Dont get mad because i helped break down different takes on miracles or the miraculous. Just because you dont like my ending definition. doesnt make it incorrect. You responding like that proves you have an agenda. Where as i just gave you food for thought before you ran off with an opinion without understanding that there isnt just one definition of the word miracle.but go on ahead and push your agena. i'll let you
.so like i said. the only way you can have a discussion is on your terms using one piece of research material. Uhh OK.
Dont get mad because i helped break down different takes on miracles or the miraculous. Just because you dont like my ending definition. doesnt make it incorrect. You responding like that proves you have an agenda. Where as i just gave you food for thought before you ran off with an opinion without understanding that there isnt just one definition of the word miracle.but go on ahead and push your agena. i'll let you
Me using a dictionary proves I have an agenda. Okay.
No. you only using the dictionary then i come behind you and explain in further detail why that definition isnt the only definition. then you come back to try and say my claim is false as if the dictionary is the only way you should research something shows you have an agenda.
Well let's have a million definitions of words and then they'll all become meaningless. Maybe your definition of "dictionary" is wrong. Maybe you don't know what I'm researching.
