Why isn't "it too much too soon" for Balor?

[R=G]

There are ways to argue this....Reigns was undefeated for a long time. They had him beat Punk a few times clean in early 2014...had him go over Blandy at Summerslam..kept the Cena burial shyt from him. Had Bryan put him over on the mic after injury Balor got a big debut...bigger than Lesnar, Angle, Rock, Austin, any of em. We'll see what commences at Summerslam.

 

[Silkk]

Thid nikka timmy never stops :kobelol:


As for the question, people like Finn and don't like Luger

 

[Silkk]

There are ways to argue this....Reigns was undefeated for a long time. They had him beat Punk a few times clean in early 2014...had him go over Blandy at Summerslam..kept the Cena burial shyt from him. Had Bryan put him over on the mic after injury Balor got a big debut...bigger than Lesnar, Angle, Rock, Austin, any of em. We'll see what commences at Summerslam.

Ehhhhh, i don't even really consider it a "debut"

 

[JerseyBoy23]

They just pinned Reigns clean three times in a row

Rollins has only got Reigns once cleanly though. They might want to save that for another event.

 

[The Rainmaker]

Because he's The Demon and we all know Vince has a pact with Satan

 

[Osmosis]

First of all there's no hypocrisy. One guy is good and OVER, the other isnt. Secondly, one strong night on Raw is in no way comparable to a 2-year Superman push. I dont think anyone is expecting Balor to win the title and suddenly be unbeatable at the top of the card from here on out. If that happens then we can at least compare them but as of now this thread is nonsense.

Balor is good and he's over to an extent. But why don't you consider Reigns "good"? Any objective viewer would say he's been in some incredible matches.

 

[Kang Deezy]

It's fresh and its new and with them starting a new era, pushing him to the top really puts over change

I wouldn't worry tho balor isn't much of a personality and isn't good on the mic, it'll catch up to him eventually

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Balor is good and he's over to an extent. But why don't you consider Reigns "good"? Any objective viewer would say he's been in some incredible matches.

Much like Cena he can put on good matches when facing all the best guys in the company in hyped up main events, but I wouldnt ever consider him one of the best wrestlers. His mic work is some of the worst ever IMO and the entire character itself is almost beyond salvaging at this point.

 

[dh86]

The fans chose Finn. He had the biggest pop on the draft show, and the biggest pop on Raw. He had a face vs face encounter with Roman and the fans made their choice. The fans never chose Roman Reigns, I don't understand how it'd be hypocrisy. Plus NXT is a part of WWE universe.

 

[Da King]

The fans chose Finn. He had the biggest pop on the draft show, and the biggest pop on Raw. He had a face vs face encounter with Roman and the fans made their choice. The fans never chose Roman Reigns, I don't understand how it'd be hypocrisy. Plus NXT is a part of WWE universe.

You can't let IWC dictate your business

Taking the title off Flair and putting on Botcha Banks also was just Money is in the chase

 

[Osmosis]

Much like Cena he can put on good matches when facing all the best guys in the company in hyped up main events, but I wouldnt ever consider him one of the best wrestlers. His mic work is some of the worst ever IMO and the entire character itself is almost beyond salvaging at this point.

Who in the company has good matches with bad wrestlers? That is a pretty odd reason to penalize someone. I think it's concerning when someone has subpar matches with good wrestlers, which is my gripe with Ambrose.

And would you consider Balor a good promo?

 

[Playaz Eyez]

They just pinned Reigns clean three times in a row

They're punishing Reigns for his wellness poppipe down OP, Balor will get washed away like the rest

 

[dh86]

You can't let IWC dictate your business

Taking the title off Flair and putting on Botcha Banks also was just Money is in the chase

If the 'IWC' also doubles as 90+% of the crowd at your shows, what does that tell you?

 

[Da King]

If the 'IWC' also doubles as 90+% of the crowd at your shows, what does that tell you?

Vocal minority

 

[Boy Wonder]

Ehhhhh, i don't even really consider it a "debut"

How is it not a debut?