Why It's Impossible to Indict a Cop
- Thread starter JahFocus CS
- Start date
Illinois Passes Bill That Makes It Illegal To Record The Police
By Thomas Halleck@tommylikeyt.halleck@ibtimes.com on December 09 2014 6:07 AM
http://www.ibtimes.com/illinois-passes-bill-makes-it-illegal-record-police-1744724
Continue to place your faith in the state brehs
By Thomas Halleck@tommylikeyt.halleck@ibtimes.com on December 09 2014 6:07 AM
http://www.ibtimes.com/illinois-passes-bill-makes-it-illegal-record-police-1744724
Continue to place your faith in the state brehs
Illinois Passes Bill That Makes It Illegal To Record The Police
By Thomas Halleck@tommylikeyt.halleck@ibtimes.com on December 09 2014 6:07 AM
http://www.ibtimes.com/illinois-passes-bill-makes-it-illegal-record-police-1744724
Continue to place your faith in the state brehs
The bill was passed by both the State House and Senate, and sent to Illinois Governor Pat Quinn on Dec. 4. It would criminalize secretly recording “private conversations” between two or more people, where at least one had a “reasonable expectation” of privacy. However, the proposed law would likely not make it illegal to record police interactions in public. Recordings like those depicting the death of Eric Garner would therefore not be affected. The new bill attempts to protect people from surreptitious and improper recording of their conversations without infringing on free-speech rights, its sponsors claim.
Reads headline again...
The bill was passed by both the State House and Senate, and sent to Illinois Governor Pat Quinn on Dec. 4. It would criminalize secretly recording “private conversations” between two or more people, where at least one had a “reasonable expectation” of privacy. However, the proposed law would likely not make it illegal to record police interactions in public. Recordings like those depicting the death of Eric Garner would therefore not be affected. The new bill attempts to protect people from surreptitious and improper recording of their conversations without infringing on free-speech rights, its sponsors claim.
Reads headline again...
We'll see.ACLU feels differently... guess we'll see how it plays out.
" Also, we cannot be arrested or prosecuted under the new statute for recording on-duty government officials who are talking to the public as part of their jobs, because those conversations are not private. The new statute respects the appellate court ruling in the case the ACLU brought against the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office: on-duty police officers have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their conversations in public places."
smARTmouf
Ascended Member
Private law enforcement?
Noooooooooooooooooooo......That's not the way to go.
With this Problem, Reaction, Solution model...THAT is one of the solution they want the public to come to....We'd be playing right in their hands breh...
Bomberman
Like a C4.
I personally think they should make a separate jail for just cops. Somewhere out in some isolated part of the country. That way there'd be no sympathy or second thought sending them to jail with the criminals they put away, they could simply be with their own kind without being targeted.
Sure they'd be with other corrupt cops and wardens that'll probably take it light on them/favor them, but at least they'd still be serving 25 to life away from society. They'd also have a criminal record and everything else once their sentence is done.
Sure they'd be with other corrupt cops and wardens that'll probably take it light on them/favor them, but at least they'd still be serving 25 to life away from society. They'd also have a criminal record and everything else once their sentence is done.
You Win Perfect
bow down
no it's not
how has this worked for the banking sector
how has this worked for environmental protection
lol yes - fine the private corporation! How many times must we write this storybook ending:
- drawn out litigation. the feds don't want to divert additional money or resources. Corporation enters into agreement with the feds to pay a reduced lumped sum payment with the stipulation that the corporation doesn't have to admit guilt.
- corporation passes on cost of litigation and fine payment to consumers
Like clockwork
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Wouldnt be any different then what we have now...Except private police forces wouldnt get to investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong
I think people just see "privatize" and get shook for no reason.
Firstly breh, what's going to happen to all of the millions of police officers around the country? They'll end up working for those private police forces. And who will be the one to investigate the police? You got it, the same group of prosecutors, judges, and grand jury members who have been letting white folk walk away from murdering black people for centuries.
Anything involving cacs is bad for us. Our #1 goal should be to separate from them. Have our own police force, our own investigaters, and our own legal system. Anything less than that will put as at the mercy of our enemies.
You believe there is an option that doesn't involve cacs?So you're saying we should swap out one group of cacs for another
Please share...
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
You believe there is an option that doesn't involve cacs?
Please share...
Physical separation from white people. The same thing Malcolm X, Marcus Garvey, and countless others have been advocating. Why do we they need to be a part of our community? We are more than capable of policing and governing ourselves.
I watched an interview with Bobby Seale (co-founder of the panthers) and he said his ultimate goal was to put a million black youth through his program, have them focus on education and economic freedom, then ultimately seceding from the US.
Do you honestly feel we can live among white people and not have to deal with white supremacy?
We have a state monopoly on law enforcement, that oversees itself, receives guaranteed funding, and is in no danger of being replaced. I doubt anyone believes that this is a scenario for accountability.
I think it's best if I just fall back and wait, the police will continue to build a strong case for me.
I'm not sure the argument about black neighborhoods not being policed under privatized law enforcement holds up anymore... I'd go as far as to say it may be a good thing at this point
But why would white supremacy stop policing poor neighborhoods... Seems counter to their agenda.
That argument might need to be bushed.
But why would white supremacy stop policing poor neighborhoods...
Seems counter to their agenda.That argument might need to be bushed.