I'm famous enough in Kobestan that they're begging to take L's from me?


Let's take a point at random and give the man what he wants
:
In the 2010 ECSF, Lebron went to war against 32-year-old Paul Pierce, who averaged 21ppg on 47% in the playoffs that year against everyone not named Lebron.
Lebron averaged
27-9-7 on 45% shooting in the series, with 13 steals and 8 blocks, while holding Pierce to
13-5-4 on 35% shooting with 7 steals and 1 block.
How the hell does Lebron completely dominate a veteran, all-star small forward like Paul Pierce, nearly doubling his stats across the board, in a series where he supposedly "quit" in every game?
The Cavs were destined to lose that series because:
Ray Allen (16-3-2) dominates Anthony Parker
Rajon Rondo (21-6-12) dominates Mo Williams
Kevin Garnett (19-8-2) dominates Antawn Jamison
What the hell was Lebron supposed to do....somehow dominate Paul Pierce AND simultaneously defend Ray Allen, Rondo, and Garnett AND magically get Mo and Jamison and Parker and old Shaq to be competent playoff players?
Game 1: Lebron lights Boston up for 35-7-7 while holding Pierce to 13 points on 5-17 shooting. Rondo/Garnett/Ray combine for 60 on efficient shooting, but Mo makes enough shots to be a sidekick and the Cavs win.
Game 2: Lebron again outplays Pierce by a mile, going 24-7-4 with 3 steals and 2 blocks to Pierce's 14-4-4 with 1 steal and no blocks. But only 2 other Cavs (Jamison and J.J. Hickson) score in double figures, while Ray/Garnett combine for 40 and Rasheed pours in 17 off the bench. Cavs lose.
This is Dan Gilbert's supposed first "quitting" game. Now, Lebron had a poor shooting game outside, but how the hell does Lebron hold Pierce to 14 points, get 3 steals and 2 blocks, force him into 4 turnovers and 5 fouls, and get to the line 15 times, in a game where he was supposedly "quitting"???
Game 3: Lebron has another monster game, with 38-8-7, a steal and 2 blocks, while holding Pierce to 11-4-3 on 4-15 shooting. Rondo and Garnett go off again, but the Cav sidekicks play their only complete game of the series, and Cavs win again.
Game 4: Lebron gets 22-9-8 with 2 steals and a block, but commits 7 turnovers. Holds Pierce to a ridiculous 9-2-2 on 3-8 shooting. But Rondo has a monster 29-18-13 game, Ray/Garnett combine for 36 and Tony Allen throws in 15 from the bench. In the 4th quarter Lebron scored 5 straight points then assisted to Varejao on a 3-point play to cut the Celtic lead to 2 with 4 minutes left, but the Celtics pull away late.
Again, how does Lebron have a near triple-double, completely clamp down Paul Pierce defensively to a ridiculous 9-2-2 game, and almost spur a 4th-quarter comeback in a game where he "quit"?
Game 5: This is the famous "quitting" game. But everyone who wasn't watching the games forgets a major factor.
Mike Brown put Lebron on Rondo the entire 1st half because Rondo had been completely dominating Mo Williams and Delonte West.
Lebron held Rondo scoreless for the entire 1st half. Rondo, who averaged 22ppg in the 1st four games, was 0-2 with 2 turnovers and 0 points in the first half with Lebron guarding him. Lebron had 8 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists at halftime, but looked ragged on offense having to defend an athletic point guard for an entire half while all the offense depends on him as well. And without Lebron guarding him, Paul Pierce, who hadn't scored more than 14 points in an entire game so far with Lebron guarding him, scored 14 in the first half against Anthony Parker and the Celtics are up 6.
So in the 3rd quarter, Mike Brown switches Lebron back onto Pierce. Lebron holds Pierce scoreless for the first 11:30 of the quarter, but Rondo goes off for 12 in the quarter after being scoreless against Lebron the whole first half. Lebron has 4 points and 2 assists in the quarter while missing a ton of jumpers.
Meanwhile, Ray and Garnett have been completely going off this whole time (43 points on 16-27 shooting) and Glen Davis poured in 15 off the bench too, so the Celtics are winning in a blowout.
That was the game where Lebron supposedly "quit". But he didn't quit. He was dominating whoever he guarded on defense while setting up his teammates well, he just was completely fatigued and couldn't buy a jumper while his coach had him running around trying to shut down Rondo. The problem is that Lebron could only shut down 1 player at a time, and 3-4 others were always going off.
Game 6: Lebron puts together a massive 27-point, 19-rebound, 10-assist, 3-steal, 1-block game (but 9 turnovers) while holding Pierce to just 13-5-3 on 4-13 shooting.
Once again, however, Rondo and Garnett both go off (combining for 43-15-15), while Rasheed and Tony Allen contribute 23 off the bench, and other than Mo no one on the Cavs can do shyt.
Lebron has 10 points, 6 boards, and 2 assists in the 4th quarter alone to close the lead to 4 at one point, but the rest of his team falls apart and can only manage 8 points and 0 assists combined in the quarter. Celtics close the series with a 10-point win.
According to Dan Gilbert and Kobestans, Lebron James becomes the only player in NBA history to manage a 27-19-10 triple-double against a great defense while shutting down a veteran all-star on the other end in a game where he apparently wasn't even trying.
That's your great example of "Lebron quitting". He averaged 27-9-7-2-2 on 45% shooting while absolutely dominating whoever he defended, but he supposedly "quit" because he couldn't put up 35 every game against one of the best defenses in the NBA and couldn't simultaneously guard 4 guys who were all better than his 2nd-best player.
Is that the kind of actual answer you wanted?