Why Psychology isn't a Science..

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
320,768
Reputation
-34,089
Daps
629,067
Reppin
The Deep State
Psychology covers a darn lot, and I'd say neuroscience could be considered a subfield of psychology.

If you're looking into purely input-output in terms of sensory processing or pavlovian-level behaviours (stimulus, observed behaviour) then you're really not far from observing just atoms colliding and noting the results.
purity.png
 

Ghost Utmost

The Soul of the Internet
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,143
Reputation
8,592
Daps
73,306
Reppin
the Aether
sociology is the weakest one out of itself, econ, and psychology

Explain yourself.

For instance: if I can determine that the incidence of homosexuality is 1000 x higher in big cities than in tribes and rural areas, then I can determine what factors cause this - what is soft or unscientific about that?

I don't know what "purity" of science is supposed to mean, I am just saying that studying HUMANS is more "important" cause that's us. The study of humans includes all the other sciences. The study of math does not include the others. In fact Math is the most basic since everything else builds on it.

Be specific if you'd like to continue to debate this. "That's stupid" is not very scientific of you.
 

Zach Lowe

what up beck
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,276
Reputation
-1,980
Daps
18,112
Explain yourself.

For instance: if I can determine that the incidence of homosexuality is 1000 x higher in big cities than in tribes and rural areas, then I can determine what factors cause this - what is soft or unscientific about that?

I don't know what "purity" of science is supposed to mean, I am just saying that studying HUMANS is more "important" cause that's us. The study of humans includes all the other sciences. The study of math does not include the others. In fact Math is the most basic since everything else builds on it.

Be specific if you'd like to continue to debate this. "That's stupid" is not very scientific of you.
you can't possibly determine what's causing the homosexuality :snoop: social science :snoop:

how fukking arrogant are social scientists that they think they can scientifically analyze homosexuality while physicists are hoping to learn more about subatomic partiples and shyt :snoop:

sociology is weaker than econ cuz at least econ has produced SOME shyt that really matters like marginal costs, diminishing returns, etc. shyt that's actually used in practice

while sociologists and political scientists keep talking as if they know shyt when all they're producing are opinions

and their work isn't taken seriously by any other academic fields or in the outside world
 

Ghost Utmost

The Soul of the Internet
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,143
Reputation
8,592
Daps
73,306
Reppin
the Aether
you can't possibly determine what's causing the homosexuality :snoop: social science :snoop:

how fukking arrogant are social scientists that they think they can scientifically analyze homosexuality while physicists are hoping to learn more about subatomic partiples and shyt :snoop:

sociology is weaker than econ cuz at least econ has produced SOME shyt that really matters like marginal costs, diminishing returns, etc. shyt that's actually used in practice

while sociologists and political scientists keep talking as if they know shyt when all they're producing are opinions

and their work isn't taken seriously by any other academic fields or in the outside world

Yeah. Like kids DON'T do better in certain environments. Like we CAN'T determine what the ideal environment is for a child. Like we CAN'T determine the things in our current environment which are causing our children to have negative outcomes. Like we CAN'T lay out solutions.

And here's the kicker: as a black person these issues are emergency level critical. Somehow getting our hoods together is more important to me than the next particle they find with an atom smasher. Life or death for my family members.
 
Top