Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[Booker T Garvey]

The reason there's no crater under the landing area is because they landed on solid rock.

​

Boy look at all that rock dust

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Here ya' go...

​

All in the same direction again...you sure I’m the crazy one here?

 

[OJ Simpsom]

The crosshairs are due to a reseau plate fitted to the Hasselblad cameras. It's a clear glass plate with the crosshairs etched into it. It is used in photogrammetry to establish geometrical basis for measuring sizes of objects in photographs.
​

That doesn't explain why some crosshairs are behind objects in the pictures as if the objects were photoshopped in.

 

[Savvir]

you're using NASA to thwart a criticism of NASA fam, that's not a good look at all

secondly, this explanation is absurd...their excuse is that everything is in museums!?

they didn't even save the blueprints or any paperwork of anything associated with traveling to the moon at all. nothing.

that would be like Microsoft not coming out w/anything after Windows 95 arguing "y'all bought everything up!! we can't many any more Windows!!"

But Microsoft and other computer vendors do turn down people due to certain products being EOL.

Would you like examples?

 

[OJ Simpsom]

Boy look at all that rock dust

He's tryna say that they avoided all the moon dust and landed directly on a clean solid rock.

 

[Booker T Garvey]

But Microsoft and other computer vendors do turn down people due to certain products being EOL.

Would you like examples?

 

[Booker T Garvey]

He's tryna say that they avoided all the moon dust and landed directly on a clean solid rock.

I didn’t even post the moon buggies, we’ve seen these videos our whole lives, never heard anybody say the moon was a solid damn rock

 

[904]

Nah bruh those shadows are pointing to the right, of one of them was pointing straight up you’d have an argument

I thought that picture was clear as day lol

You could see this for yourself outside though.. No point in giving more evidence of the behavior of shadows

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Source?

The Sea of Tranquility is actually an ancient lava flow.​

​

Boy look at all that rock dust

A couple inches of dust on top of solid rock.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

He's tryna say that they avoided all the moon dust and landed directly on a clean solid rock.

No, that's a strawman. I'm saying that a couple inches of dust on top of solid rock won't produce a crater when a lunar lander sets down on it.

If it had CRASHED into the Moon, you'd have a point, though.

​

 

[thekingsmen]

no. it does. because by your logic, we have the technology now to go to the moon, but don't.

You can't leave earth my friend... That's fact.

Wanting to go to mars =//= having the tech, support, and protocols in place already.

Going to the moon would require development of a wide assortment of new tech to make it a viable and safe mission. Definitely aint going back in the equipment from the 60's that is no longer supported by the retired engineers of that day.

Right so what is the issue for not going back to the Moon to prove the point? If I told you I climbed the Dubai highrises but destroyed any proof of doing so, you would want me to do it again to prove that I did it.

 

[Geordi]

If we went back to the moon again today would you believe we did?

 

[ChatGPT-5]

You can't leave earth my friend... That's fact.



Right so what is the issue for not going back to the Moon to prove the point? If I told you I climbed the Dubai highrises but destroyed any proof of doing so, you would want me to do it again to prove that I did it.

so the black woman that calculated the trajectory for it, was wrong?

 

[Booker T Garvey]

A couple inches of dust on top of solid rock.

​

So astronauts made deep footprints in the ground, but their shuttles can’t make a crater though.

You’re right, your bullshyt is fascinating, do keep going

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

That doesn't explain why some crosshairs are behind objects in the pictures as if the objects were photoshopped in.

Actually, it does since they aren't 'behind' the objects.

​