Why Would Trump Is Building A Nuclear Reactor On The Moon. WHY????????????

[904]

the moon is the perfect military base

can be used to lob missiles anywhere on earth

They would take FOREVER to get Earth..

nikkas would've changed their mind after launch

 

[Texkmot2446]

Money Laundering. That was Trump's primary source of income for decades.

 

[Jaylen Tatum]

 

[maxamusa]

 

[maxamusa]

the moon is the perfect military base

can be used to lob missiles anywhere on earth

never that

 

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

 

[3rdWorld]

Epstein is involved somehow.

 

[Fillerguy]

This is a legitimate great idea and it doesn't belong to Trump. The world needs another space race. Tying it up with a nuclear energy race is a plus.

Too bad for us, China will do it first.

 

[MegaTronBomb!]

At this point, you shouldn't even be entertaining these type of 2nd grader who just went to the science center level ass statements.

 

[MegaTronBomb!]

This is a legitimate great idea and it doesn't belong to Trump. The world needs another space race. Tying it up with a nuclear energy race is a plus.

Too bad for us, China will do it first.

It is, but not for the reason you'd be thinking.

Ultimately, this idea is something that the scientific community can straight up tell them to fukk off over....and ultimately there is no way around it with trying to install unqualified loyalists to devise a way to not only terraform the moon, devise a Nuclear Reactor that would work within the parameters of the moon.... trying to figure out how to build,test,and operate said reactor on the moon....getting all the supplies there.......and an entire crew of workers to run the reactor....plus all casualty and contingency plans that would need to exist.


You then have to ask the question, what are you even powering ?



More importantly, an event like this would challenge and defeat the very core principles of anti-intellectualism...and that's what drives their entire mission plan.

 

[Striving For Greatness]

When’s the last time someone was actually on the moon

 

[ReturnOfJudah]

If white people said it, then it must be true looking ahh

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

 

[Fillerguy]

It is, but not for the reason you'd be thinking.

Ultimately, this idea is something that the scientific community can straight up tell them to fukk off over....and ultimately there is no way around it with trying to install unqualified loyalists to devise a way to not only terraform the moon, devise a Nuclear Reactor that would work within the parameters of the moon.... trying to figure out how to build,test,and operate said reactor on the moon....getting all the supplies there.......and an entire crew of workers to run the reactor....plus all casualty and contingency plans that would need to exist.


You then have to ask the question, what are you even powering ?



More importantly, an event like this would challenge and defeat the very core principles of anti-intellectualism...and that's what drives their entire mission plan.

Almost everything you wrote was said about landing on the moon. Apollo wasn’t just “flags and footprints.” It created advances in computing, materials science, telecommunications, and manufacturing that still pay off today.

A lunar nuclear program could push forward

Radiation shielding tech, autonomous robotic, life support systems, long range communications, proof of the possibly of long term human colonization of non-Earth objects etc. Humanity needs a moon base if we plan on exploring the rest of our solar system. We need a consist and reliable power source to do it. Nuclear power is the best we have at the moment and the largest nuclear power on the planet purposely holds back on its nuclear capabilities for ????? reasons



Forgive me if I'm wrong but your issues are mostly the logistics of this. This has mostly been solved. We already have designs for reactors that operate in harsh, subzero conditions. We already have self running facilities that require little upkeep. Scientists have been theorycrafting this since before I was a child. Virtually every moon base design is built on putting a nuclear facility on the moon.

The only anti-intellectualism here is the decades of left wing fearmongering fed to us about nuclear power. The decades right wing fearmongering about how "unfeasible" the cost of NASA/space travel is , all while funding billions into fighter jets that only exist to perpetually be test ran.

All that being said, the likelyhood of America being the first is slim. China/Russia will probably pull it off first. Even India just landed on the moon. We haven't made serious plans to go back to the moon in nearly half a century.

 

[Gritsngravy]

If y’all been paying attention, it’s lowkey been a decent amount of space missions happening, especially based around the moon

Now why would you put a nuclear power on the moon, they probably trying to put labs and other types of shyt on there, make it a base for other shyt including potential mars missions