Why would Trump never target Black Americans?

[Prynce]

Civil war.
Civil rights.
Black panthers got some of their agendas met.
Black Americans ended apartheid in SA. Our influence directly.

White surpremacy will never stop until they and their beliefs are eradicated. We are the only ones who actively fight against it.

The civil war had little do with slavery. It was states rights and Lincoln didn’t care it black people stayed slaves or not.

Most black people didn’t even support the civil rights movement. Ironically it was the people you would hate and call liberal shills who did that.

Black panthers got gun rights removed in Cali. They were locked up and eradicated. Then the crackas took their ideas after they crushed them.

Inspiring someone to fight for themselves didn’t end anything. South Africans and pressure from the world ended apartheid.

 

[MrLogic]

The civil war had little do with slavery. It was states rights and Lincoln didn’t care it black people stayed slaves or not.

Black panthers got gun rights removed in Cali. They were locked up and eradicated. Then the crackas took their ideas after they crushed them.

Inspiring someone to fight for themselves didn’t end anything. South Africans and pressure from the world ended apartheid.

The whole point was state rights to have slaves


lol

 

[Prynce]

the whole point

was state rights to have slaves duh


lol

I mean slavery played a part but, the union still had slave states, that they didn’t force to end slavery. It was about keeping the south in check. If that wasn’t the case why was West Virginia and etc allowed to continue slavery?

 

[DonRe]

Well he hasnt done nothing on DEI initiatives nor worrying about water contamination in black communities nor erasing key figures from federal institutions nor helping curtail the banning on black authors and narratives from schools. Nor the fact that reparations arent on the dockett.

Not including the general disregard for the rule Of law and federal judicial decision. Nor the fact that duke a felon, white, and emotional

None of it Matters because unless it happens to you or yours, its fukk you and yours.

You take on the same mentality as your oppressor for fear of being grouped with the other

Fear
Mongering ? when the shyt is out in the open and comes from his mouth. Is the fact that the groundwork for the future is being laid, not evident. Or the fact that the people he empowers are evil sacks of shyt?

 

[Voice of Reason]

Read the comments…..it’s all “fear mongering” according to some of these idiots

Yall really want us to get deported with you

 

[MrLogic]

I mean slavery played a part but, the union still had slave states, that they didn’t force to end slavery. It was about keeping the south in check. If that wasn’t the case why was West Virginia and etc allowed to continue slavery?

Senate Charles Sumner objected to the admission of a new slave state, (west virgina) while Benjamin Wade defended statehood as long as a gradual emancipation clause would be included in the new state constitution.


know the full context about a subject first are you from the states?

born and raise in usa?
becuase those talkings point are always given to black people outside of america to understand "oh that slavery thing was just a small issue talking point"




when the whole damn war was actually about

The core issue was for state rights to have salves if they wanted salves that's the whole point

other words cacs cherry picking what the feds let them do and not do

kinda like today.

 

[Voice of Reason]

Well he hasnt done nothing on DEI initiatives nor worrying about water contamination in black communities nor erasing key figures from federal institutions nor helping curtail the banning on black authors and narratives from schools. Nor the fact that reparations arent on the dockett.

Not including the general disregard for the rule Of law and federal judicial decision. Nor the fact that duke a felon, white, and emotional

None of it Matters because unless it happens to you or yours, its fukk you and yours.

You take on the same mentality as your oppressor for fear of being grouped with the other

Fear
Mongering ? when the shyt is out in the open and comes from his mouth. Is the fact that the groundwork for the future is being laid, not evident. Or the fact that the people he empowers are evil sacks of shyt?

Y'all said fukk FBA's when you came over here and ignored the systematic racism that keeps a segment of FBA/ADOS people generationally poor and said , "Work Harder".


These POC including Black immigrants, did not give a damn about mass incarceration, Black folks experiencing gentrification, the lack of wealth, etc.

 

[Prynce]

Senate Charles Sumner objected to the admission of a new slave state, while Benjamin Wade defended statehood as long as a gradual emancipation clause would be included in the new state constitution.


know the full context about a subject first are you from the states?

Sooo again states rights … you are trying to paint the issue being solely about slavery. When slaves states were in the union fighting the confederacy. Yes, the initial argument that sparked it was the admission of states that were just added to the countr, being able to have slaves or not(even then they were worried about the balance of power and votes, southern states would get if more slave states were added). But the bigger argument was what can a state do and not do. That’s why I said from just it had partly to do with it but it wasn’t the biggest issue. Cause it if it was why didn’t slavery end in the north?

Also the north just didn’t want slave states to have more power

Also bro don’t insult my intelligence with that weird ass know the contexts BS. Secondly I’m from Atlanta Georgia. My entire education life from kindergarten we were taught about the civil war. Now if you wanna argue about semantics that’s another thing but what I’m saying is easy to google

 

[MrLogic]

Sooo again states rights … you are trying to paint the issue being solely about slavery. When slaves states were in the union fighting the confederacy. Yes, the initial argument that sparked it was the admission of states that were just added to the country. But the bigger argument was what can a state do and not do. That’s why I said from just it had partly to do with it but it wasn’t the biggest issue. Cause it if it was why didn’t slavery end in the north?

Also bro don’t insult my intelligence with that weird ass know the contexts BS. Secondly I’m from Atlanta Georgia. My entire education life from kindergarten we were taught about the civil war. Now if you wanna argue about semantics that’s another thing but what I’m saying is easy to google

it was state rights to have slaves.


what else was it ?


I'm not going back n forth with this.

You can't just use a blanket term "state rights"

with out sayin what actually the right of the state they wanted.



Now list every state right they didn't want the feds controlling?
i'll wait.

 

[Prynce]

it was state rights to have slaves.


what else was it ?


I'm not going back n forth with this.

It was about the balance of power of slave states and none slave states. Slave states technically had more voting power cause of the slaves. It was way more of a complex issue than the rightness and wrongness of slavery

 

[MrLogic]

It was about the balance of power of slave states and none slave states. Slave states technically had more voting power cause of the slaves. It was way more of a complex issue than the rightness and wrongness of slavery

I'm not talking about morals didn't mention it at all because in the end cacs and morals don't mix.

I'm talking about their state rights to have slaves.

spin it how you want it

their state right was to have slaves and they wanted to die on that hill makes sense because that business model was in usa since colonial times so yes they would fight over it

not sure why that bothers you of what state right i'm saying it was
not that complex and not that deep.

 

[Prynce]

I'm not talking about morals didn't mention it at all.

I'm talking about their state rights to have slaves.

spin it how you want it

their state right was to have slaves and they wanted to die on that hill.
not sure why that bothers you

I think we making the same point and talking past each other

 

[DonRe]

Y'all said fukk FBA's when you came over here and ignored the systematic racism that keeps a segment of FBA/ADOS people generationally poor and said , "Work Harder".


These POC including Black immigrants, did not give a damn about mass incarceration, Black folks experiencing gentrification, the lack of wealth, etc.

Im asking you to look at the facts. And use that as a guide to how this can be used against you.

Even if you dont cape for anyone but yourself. Or only black americans, how can you, as a contributor to this society and economy, remove yourself to what your hard earned money is being used for ? Devoid of any party or affiliation.

How is the power you give, in the way of indifference and your taxes, can be used against you because of what? slavery ? Like they arent the same people saying “get over it” yet have given scraps to the fba community?

Just a thought ock.

 

[Barlow]

Why do you assume because ppl care about immigrants getting deported they didnt care about that other shyt when it happened?

Because you just want to whine and stomp your feet because other ppl care about things and you can't stop them

nikka I don't care what you care about. Just stop trying to make me care by fear mongering. And if you did care about those other things, immigrants getting deported wouldn't be your breaking point for the end of black people.

 

[DaKidFromNoWhere]

We been getting chess played on us for a long time.
Its gonna take a RUDE awaking for us(minorities)to get on the same page.
But for now I am riding for mine.