Bruh, I'm waiting for something that's actually bad here.
The DNC is under no obligation to bend over backwards for someone who did jack shyt to the party's development or had any influence in it.
This is what happens when rising in politics is all about networking and money.Good lord
Both of these parties are full of clowns.![]()
Bro, Sanders is not a socialist. Europe has real socialists. Sanders is just a guy who is trying to make our nation more equitable while keeping capitalism in place. He's like Corbyn in the UK.There's a difference between not bending over backwards and actively plotting against Sanders. I didn't want a socialist to win either, but this shyt is despicable. They shouldve remained neutral. And to watch democrats try to spin this on canle news is laughable. Im truly disgusted by our choices this year
There's a difference between not bending over backwards and actively plotting against Sanders. I didn't want a socialist to win either, but this shyt is despicable. They shouldve remained neutral. And to watch democrats try to spin this on canle news is laughable. Im truly disgusted by our choices this year
I go everywhere bruh....like i know bretbart leans a little to the right Alternet leans a little to the left so if breitbart says something negative about the right its quite likely true ...I dont think Bias is a problem as long as its declared openlyWhat sites do you all go to for unbiased news??
I like the fact that right leaning sites like truth revolt and the dailer caller exist to counter balance left leaning sites like politico and buzzfeed but where can someone go to get UNBIASED news?
I used to watch CNN but they have been completely biased this election cycle for Hillary shyt is unwatchable. MSNBC and Foxnews are cheerleaders, so link me to a good site.
Russia isn't communist.They can't stop Trump any other way so they're going with the old school "He's a communist" route.
" ass bullshyt.I go everywhere bruh....like i know bretbart leans a little to the right Alternet leans a little to the left so if breitbart says something negative about the right its quite likely true ...I dont think Bias is a problem as long as its declared openly
However these area few good sites i know
- The Nation (thenation.com)
- WorldNews (WN) Network (wn.com)
- ProPublica (propublica.org)
- The Center for Public Integrity (publicintegrity.org)
- FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) (fair.org)
- Who, What, Why (whowhatwhy.org)
- Sputnik (sputniknews.com)
- Watchdog.org
- The Christian Science Monitor (csmonitor.com)
- Reuters (reuters.com)

The veracity was never in question. But the motivation is.Democrats and their surrogates trying to pin this on Putin is fukking hilarious. Who gives a shyt where the leak originated from, the real question is are they true or not? Unless you're disputing the veracity of the leaks, trying to impugn the character of the leaker is some ad hominem bullshyt. Ol' "well, did Snowden have any traffic tickets" ass bullshyt.
The veracity was never in question. But the motivation is.
Dudes aren't doing themselves any justice or favors by succumbing to curated leaks meant to emotionally stir the pot of dissent and internal fracture
Does it matter what the motivation was? The anger is directed at the wrongdoing. If they hadn't done anything wrong, there wouldn't have even been an opportunity for the "agents" to spread dissent and fracture.The veracity was never in question. But the motivation is.
Dudes aren't doing themselves any justice or favors by succumbing to curated leaks meant to emotionally stir the pot of dissent and internal fracture
fixedThis is what happens when rising in any position is all about networking and money.
