Considering where they were as players at the same age I think Wiggins will be better or just as good as George. He's probably gonna average 22 a night next year which I think Paul has done only once so far in his career. And Andrew has the potential to be the best perimeter defender in the game too if he really wants it.
Will Andrew Wiggins ever become better than Paul George is now?
- Thread starter Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD
- Start date
I don't know will George ever become as good as he is now...George twenty fukking four
Lucky_Lefty
Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
back to ignore status
Wiggins has a higher ceiling but PG is only 24 and the dude was coming into his own. It was George, Harden, and Durant who were looking like the superstars and competing in one on one matches, before Georgr broke his leg. But those were the guys that were looked at as the superstar tier.
Paul George is on the tier below "franchise changer" when it comes to where he is now and he can grow into that.
Paul George is on the tier below "franchise changer" when it comes to where he is now and he can grow into that.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
I don't know will George ever become as good as he is now...George twenty fukking four
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
Breh, get over it. Harden is an elite offensive player, no matter how you feel about how he gets his points or his game.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
There's nothing to get over. Harden WAS NOT on the same level as KD, prior to Paul George getting injured. He wasn't looked at as a superstar. He just came off another first round exit shooting below 40%, and there were (there still is) serious questions regarding how far he could lead a team.
paul george broke his leg, why do people act like this would be a set back? Its a broken leg, your bone is actually stronger than it was before after you heal completely from a broken bone. Granted the surgery was done correctly