ExactlyThis (the no-indictment on the Garner case) shows why protests don't do shyt.
shyt the turnt up riots in Ferguson show why protests don't do shyt. Cop resigned. OK. What now?
ExactlyThis (the no-indictment on the Garner case) shows why protests don't do shyt.
Whats the implication here? All this says to me is that black people dont want to be cops in Ferguson. Unless you have proof that black people try to become cops and get discriminated against.67% close enough.
In 1970, Ferguson was 99% white; now, the city has a 29% white population and 67% black. The police department, however, does not reflect the demographics of the town's residents — only three of the 53-officer department are black. The police chief, Thomas Jackson, is white.
It will be once white flight kicks in at 2015.67% close enough.
In 1970, Ferguson was 99% white; now, the city has a 29% white population and 67% black. The police department, however, does not reflect the demographics of the town's residents — only three of the 53-officer department are black. The police chief, Thomas Jackson, is white.
Whats the implication here?
So lets say we riot and destroy NYC. What happens next?That white people don't care what happens to Ferguson but they do care about what happens to NYC.
So lets say we riot and destroy NYC. What happens next?
And how does there being no black cops in Ferguson equate to white people not caring about what happens in Ferguson?
Take a walk my g you are delirious with rage.
You still not making any sense dawg. Log off for a dayNo i'm saying white people don't care about Ferguson because they are the minority there.
In terms of population %.
You still not making any sense dawg. Log off for a day
The whites have practically taken over the protests so of course it will be some kumbaya bullshyt