Wimbeldon Appreciation Thread

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,301
Reputation
7,240
Daps
125,738
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
cambridge-co_-uk_.jpg
 

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,301
Reputation
7,240
Daps
125,738
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
I dont get the nadal/federer legacy comparisons...federer in his prime has no equal...Take away Rafa's french opens hes got nothing...

:ehh: He's beaten Fed twice at Australian open and at Wimbleon. You can't use that logic of "taking" a surface away from a player to devalue them
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
Hes owned him during his decline,he'll never be what Fed was in his prime.
Federer was dominant everywhwere not just one surface...

20-10.. not just on one surface. And his decline is due in large part to not being able to beat Rafa.

How dominant was Federer on clay?
 

Miggs

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
41,607
Reputation
3,290
Daps
83,249
Reppin
T.O.
30-15.. not just on one surface. And his decline is due in large part to not being able to beat Rafa.

His record against Nadal doesnt negate the fact his prime trumps nadals by a wide margin,total wins and they are spread around amongt the majors not just ONE...
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
His record against Nadal doesnt negate the fact his prime trumps nadals by a wide margin,total wins and they are spread around amongt the majors not just ONE...

Nadal hasn't won just the French though.. why do you repeat that especially when he beat Fed at Wimbledon?

You say he spread it around when he only won the French once and didn't even face Nadal for it.

LOL @ "total wins" for someone who's played far longer. You do know that Nadal has the higher winning %, right?
 
Top