One of the most exciting, sure. But better than Pierce? Nah, son. If anything they were even at their peaks. Vince just had a lot more hype.Pierce was not better than Vince in their primes.
Pierce has passed him over time, but Vince was a great, great player and one of the most exciting players to ever play in the game.
Was Reggie Miller top 5?He was never top 5.![]()
One of the most exciting, sure. But better than Pierce? Nah, son. If anything they were even at their peaks. Vince just had a lot more hype.
If it was up to me. He wouldn't be in either.Was Reggie Miller top 5?
How was Carter better?Vince was better in their primes. Pierce had a better career.
better defender, great shooter, and he had some bad teams in Toronto.How was Carter better?
can he dunk his way to the HOF?
The nerve of this fukker. I can just picture Jordan watching this clip and being like [Malice]"But make no mistake, you and I, we are not the same"[/Malice]
Dude is more than a dunker. Vince was a baller and he still playing very well at 36, forget what y'all heard. Dude made that Toronto team relevant and competitive. When he was at the Nets, he had the whole league like
Remember this is not the NFL. Its a little easier to get in. He has a chance.
In the 2000s, the best perimeter players, at their peak, were:
1) Kobe
2) T-Mac
3) AI
4) Paul Pierce
5) Vince Carter
![]()
What the fukk did Vince win? Did he make his teams better?
The best moments of his career are winning a dunk contest, jumping over a French dude and missing that shot in Game 7 against Philly
Sent from my Comet using Tapatalk 2