nah its good that deadspin is complaining about sht. Its just that the writing and logical reasoning on some of the articles aren't up to par. Some writers on there let their own agenda dictate what they write.
Winston's accuser speaks publicly for the first time on CNN tonight in "The Hunting Ground"
- Thread starter Dr. Narcisse
- Start date
All their fake outrage against mayweather and nfl players is getting old. They take the same sanctimonious position on everything it's comical at this point.
Why is it fake outrage? Women beaters don't really deserve the benefit of the doubt imo.
again, some of the outrage is warranted(you should read up on the sht mayweather did). The problem starts is when the writing becomes agenda driven with no objectivity.
it's fake outrage because athlete domestic violence is the flavor of the month once public interest wanes and the clicks slow down, the media will back off and find something more lucrative to latch unto.
Also Mayweathers most recent dv arrest was 2010 and no one in the media cared. He had 5 fights since then with no issues but here we are in 2015 and media suddenly won't shut up about it. #fakeoutrage
They show no objectivity whatsoever. It's tasteless and redundant at this point. The article about jameis where the writer claims he must be guilty because of probability and not evidence is a good example of their stupidity.
Last edited:
the next guy
Superstar
Yup, we knew this for years and now you care? There is being an advocate and trying to ruin the big event.
Exactly, dude had 4 fights after getting out of jail and they waited until this one to start talking about boycotting, questioning why he wasn't banned from boxing and trying to tie the domestic shyt with his boxing style while deifying Manny.
Some writer for Deadspin that said Jameis was guilty because math
Post the tweets.
Dr. Narcisse
Veteran
thats what im talking about when i said some of their articles lacks objectivity and are clearly agenda driven.
as far as the mayweather sht: if the article itself is objective, its hard to be mad at it even if the writer is being selective.
jwonder
Superstar
It's fake outrage because it's a star. What about all the regular woman beaters? That's ok? I don't see all these fagots volunteering at shelters where woman have been abused. Especially on social media, muthafukkas love to get bent out of shape on EVERYTHING.
Furthermore Mayweather is guilty of fukking with aggressive bytches with all that mouth. I stay away from them. Thus why I have no domestic violence charges
It's fake outrage because it's a star. What about all the regular woman beaters? That's ok? I don't see all these fagots volunteering at shelters where woman have been abused. Especially on social media, muthafukkas love to get bent out of shape on EVERYTHING.
Furthermore Mayweather is guilty of fukking with aggressive bytches with all that mouth. I stay away from them. Thus why I have no domestic violence charges
I don't rock with the idea that if you aren't doing EVERYTHING you can't do anything.
I agree that the selective and inconsistent response is less than ideal. And maybe some of the people jumping in to comment are doing so with "fake outage" or whatever.
But these are WOMEN BEATERS. They deserve to be called out, and constantly. They're reprehensible.