Some of these "sexual assault" numbers are fabricated to the maximum when you actually hear how some of these "surveys" are conducted. The one where they say 1/5 (sometimes it says 1/3) women are sexually assaulted on campus, the questionnaire asks them questions like, "Has a man every looked at you, and did that make you feel even a little uncomfortable"? If they answer "yes" to that, it goes right along with the statistics that they faced a "type" of sexual assault.
That reminds me when I was in grad school I read a study how folks were using funny numbers to show how many black kids were born out of wedlock.
Well in review of this one study an independent investigation was done and found that the people who were conducting the study were purposely misleading folks or marking down what ever they wanted to.
So basically the study would ask random women did the have kids and if the kids were born out of wedlock....seems easy right.
Well what they were doing is asking white women did they have kids and if they said yes they would ask them if they were married. If they said yes they would mark them down as married and if they daid no they would mark them down as unwed with kids out of wedlock or divorced.
But with the black and Latin women they would ask them if they had kids and if they said yes they would not ask them if they were married or divorced. They would automatically mark them down as having kids out of wedlock and being unwed mothers.
I tell folks all the time some of the studies on blacks and latins are fishy because the folks who are collecting the data are purposely trying to put so called minorities in a bad light.