WOMEN ARE NOT EQUAL TO MEN, AND THEY NEVER WILL BE...
- Thread starter nineteeneightysix
- Start date
Breh u said urself
"men are essentially USELESS to the survival of humanity..."
How else would u expect someone to interpret that but that u feel that men are useless to the survival of humanity
And this contradicts directly with the point made about us having a physical advantage over women. If we have an innate advantage how are we useless?
And the whole tone of your opening posts contradicts this one... you see the benefits of women having the freedom and opportunity to do things that were only allowed to men on a daily basis.... which is all (REAL) feminism is about. Not that misandric manpocalypse perpetuated by losers on the internet
Thats just the tip of the iceberg, I dont have the time or desire to go all the way in... but to summarize this whole thread doesnt make much sense
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Biology is not a good excuse to treat women bad friend.
nineteeneightysix
Banned
(1) My initial assertion was that "men are superior to women"...My "men are essentially USELESS to the survival of humanity" statement was to demonstrate that my initial assessment was NOT based on some "women hating" trip...Like most of you WRONGLY suggesting...
(2) It is interesting to note that NO ONE has attempted to challenge my position statement, I have been getting are personal attack on my sexuality...Typical...
(3) To keep matters VERY simple, on a macro level, humans are governed by Biology and Society...Biology and Society (environment) interchangeably affect each other...
It just so happens that Nature gave Men the superior biology, and men were able to use their superior biology to gain social power over women...Are you guys SERIOUSLY denying this assertion...?
Basically, it is not a women bashing thread...It is just an assertion of a position that society pretends to ignore, with no success, because every time a woman gets punched or raped, the public opinion strongly reasserts the opinion that "women are helpless creatures who need the protection of men"...
If a dude had spat on Ray Rice and got KO'd for it, the public would have applauded Ray Rice...
Also, men are more likely to be victims of violent crimes than women, and yet social programs have ALL types funding for abused women, and only Crime Stoppers commercials for men who are victims of violence...
We ain't equal...
Yes
What was superior back in the caveman days is not necessarily relevant now
What matters more today... who can survive out in the wilderness... or who can provide value to corporations and consumers
From that POV men and women are equal... being bigger and stronger has no bearing on success in the modern world. It's all about intelligence and critical thinking, which has no gender bias
So if that's the whole premise of your rant
BlvdBrawler
Superstar
So, if you read a research article and spotted a spelling error, would you question the researcher's level of learning, because of that error...?
I guess when the Doctor tells you to take your pill at 1800, you take that pill at 1800 to the second...
Sorry, for not being as anal as you...
Bruh you know goddamn well that wasn't a "spelling" error.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
OP might be the worst poster on this site. He said Nelly and Hammer > Ghostface in the booth yesterday.
I agree with the OP. But at the same time I'm fine with it being this way. Woman should be protected. In order for a civil stable society society to exist, the most disadvantaged members must be protected or chaos will ensue.
What he's trying to get at (yeah I can understand anyone) is that if women are equal to men, why are the physical actions of a man towards a women looked at different than a man hitting another man or a women hitting a man...Yes
What was superior back in the caveman days is not necessarily relevant now
What matters more today... who can survive out in the wilderness... or who can provide value to corporations and consumers
From that POV men and women are equal... being bigger and stronger has no bearing on success in the modern world. It's all about intelligence and critical thinking, which has no gender bias
So if that's the whole premise of your rant
But when one is talking about equality, one is seldom talking about physical abilities and the rest of your post pretty much summed up the adequate response. I seriously debated tossing this into the bushes of the thread title alone honestly..
Also debating creating a HL hashtag to be used whenever someone says some off the wall shyt.
nineteeneightysix
Banned
Now you are just being contrary...It is a BIOLOGICAL fact that men are physically superior to women...We shouldn't even be debating this...
Now, you are being ignorant...Biology MATTERS...This is why parents allow their male children more freedom than their female children...Male children suffer more physical injuries than female children, probably because parents don't supervise them as much and allow them to engage in more risky behaviours...
This is probably because of the difference between male and female biology, which ultimately affects our behaviours...
What matters more today... who can survive out in the wilderness... or who can provide value to corporations and consumers[/QUOTE]
And this is were the "smoke screen" comes into play...The illusion that corporations and consumerism has any real power...This is the social brainwashing aspect of human society...The only time you can really know what has real power is when the social scaffold is destroyed, and you have to survive...That time is war...
Men and women CANNOT be equal since men already have the biological advantage...Women are given power by men through the social scaffold we have created to protect women under the pretext of "social equality"...
If you were a drug dealer with a gang of 30 Ronda Rouseys protecting you, you would get kicked out of your block by a rival dealer with a gang of 30 Floyd Mayweathers protecting him...
Power can only be given by men...Griselda Blanco "The Black Widow" of drug cartels had "power" only because she had loyal men willing to keep her at the top...If she had nothing but women protecting her, she would have gotten raped, robbed of all her coke and money, and thrown in the bushes...
Men are more savage than women...Only men can protect anything or anyone from other men...
Men commit more violence than women because of our biological advantage...A woman only has her wits and vagina to to rely on...A man has his penis, anus (if he is a fakkitt), physical prowess and wits...More weapons to survive at time of peace or time of war...
I am not ranting...I am not an emotional dude to be ranting....In most situations, I am calm and collected...So if that's the whole premise of your rant
Im pretty sure he said Chief Keef is a GOAT rapper ..and was dead fukkin serious. Had a long ass explanation and shyt.
nineteeneightysix
Banned
(1) You are right...I wouldn't care if my parents died because they NO LONGER have any power over me....I exist separate from them...I think therefore I am...Op is the same person who admitted he wouldn't give a fukk if his parents died and said he even told him that himself because he doesn't need them lol
He gets constantly clowned in the booth
(2) Why am I this way...? Because my parents taught me to be independent from a very young age...I am healthy and I make my own money, my parents taught me to think in a way were I am always analysing the pros and cons of any situation, and making decision based on the most probable positive outcome for myself...
They raised me TOO WELL...To the point were I am not emotionally attached to them because (1) I believe emotions are USELESS and they only stop one from making the best possible decisions...