Women DON'T Retain DNA From All Partners

[Cadillac]

Easy now. Your feminine energy is beginning to show. Look how offended this "dude" got on behalf of black women

Im gonna call you a hoe now actually. You are much more in touch with your feminine side... and i have a feeling you a fraud as well

no i just can see through that nikkas BS just like I can yours. If i was offended as you claim. I would have denied BW did that. But they do and I do not defend them on shyt like that. and other stupid stuff they do.

@bold: nikka idgaf how your nonados irrelevent ass feel. You a foreign fakkit imo.

 

[Phitz]

yeah but we shed dead skin cells everyday, so depending on what type of interaction you have with someone you can leave dead skin cells on their body or in their mouth or other cavity.

 

[GodsPerspective]

no i just can see through that nikkas BS just like I can yours. If i was offended as you claim. I would have denied BW did that. But they do and I do not defend them on shyt like that. and other stupid stuff they do.

@bold: nikka idgaf how your nonados irrelevent ass feel. You a foreign fakkit imo.

You're a whole hoe, and you accidentally exposed yourself.

I see you now

You going on ignore, enough of your hoe shyt

 

[Eddie_1100]

And yet bw wondered why they aren't valued like other groups of women.

Not at all a surprising comment from someone who didn’t feel an obvious racist (@Yoda) should’ve been banned...





You boys have fun now..

 

[Cadillac]

You're a whole hoe, and you accidentally exposed yourself.

I see you now

You going on ignore, enough of your hoe shyt

thats doesnt mean much coming from you

go on and put me on ignore,

and the irony of you calling me a hoe, but you use hoe rhetoric of telling me you gon put me on ignore like thats suppose to hurt. thats something bytches do. Just do it nikka dont tell me

 

[Taadow]

Technically, y'alls main points are both correct.
The disconnect has to do with what point people realize the highlighted...

Because u judging us through the way you as a man would be if you were in our position.

Women have access to sex and male attention if they want it early in life. The shyt gets old and becomes meh if you smart enough to see it for what it is.

Men are the ones who lose their minds over p*ssy. Most women ain’t going crazy over dikk in the same way. We damn sure ain’t setting up casting couches and/or having entire countries with rape fests or jeopardizing careers by getting caught up in some sexual harassment shyt. For majority of women—unless they are in love love, it ain’t that deep.

1) Most women can't get enough of men attention

2) Most women are very promiscuous, especially in a favorable environment where sex is a game

3) That promiscuity comes with a price, mentally and spiritually.

Women and men do not see sex the same way. Women pursuit sex for different reasons, however, in a promiscuous culture, women keep their legs open. It's the reality now.

 

[Youseenmywork]

Technically, y'alls main points are both correct.
The disconnect has to do with what point people realize the highlighted...

I respectfully disagree ...I will NEVER agree with a women that has white women talking points as well as a gynocentric and feminist mindset. Maann the Renaissance and revolution that is happening internally won't be viralized thoe ...

 

[GrindtooFilthy]

False. It started in 2012......8 years ago.

Gained traction 5 years later on social media and been thrown around in various threads on here since then.​

Microchimerism has been around for a long time, this is my problem with you. You deadass think you know it all as another poster said

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Microchimerism has been around for a long time, this is my problem with you. You deadass think you know it all as another poster said

As I said, I'm no 'know-it-all' and no one was talking about the retention of male DNA in females.....which is the title and subject of this thread......until a study was released in 2012 and hyped-up in 2017.​

No one aside from a very few scientists were talking about microchimerism. Social media changed ALL that.​

I deadass know what I'm talking about when I make threads. I don't do it unless I'm fully conversant with the subject, thus, I don't make many and am FULLY prepared to discuss them in the case of objections.....which ALWAYS happen here.

The poster you're referring to is an atheist and is just butthurt that NONE of his arguments work against me since strawmen are invalid.​

​

 

[Taadow]

I respectfully disagree ...I will NEVER agree with a women that has white women talking points as well as a gynocentric and feminist mindset. Maann the Renaissance and revolution that is happening internally won't be viralized thoe ...

Regardless of the source, facts are facts.

It's a fact that young women in their prime can have a large array of men to choose from,
and it's a fact that when they really got a craving for a dicc, it can be any dicc closeby that
is in the right place and time. She can rationalize it however she needs to later.


...now, I don't agree it stays that way - but that's another topic.

 

[GrindtooFilthy]

As I said, I'm no 'know-it-all' and no one was talking about the retention of male DNA in females.....which is the title and subject of this thread......until a study was released in 2012 and hyped-up in 2017.​

No one aside from a very few scientists were talking about microchimerism. Social media changed ALL that.​

I deadass know what I'm talking about when I make threads. I don't do it unless I'm fully conversant with the subject, thus, I don't make many and am FULLY prepared to discuss them in the case of objections.....which ALWAYS happen here.

The poster you're referring to is an atheist and is just butthurt that NONE of his arguments work against me since strawmen are invalid.​

​

False, on that we've been talking about it for ages we just didn't have an adequate scientific term attached to it\

You never heard of folks talk about transmission of spiritual energy when engaging in intercourse

 

[The Quixotic]

While women may not inherit dna from sexual partners they are psychologically imprinted by every partner. This imprinting is permanent and can not be altered and it will affect her sexual and relational behaviors.

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

Technically, y'alls main points are both correct.
The disconnect has to do with what point people realize the highlighted...

It’s also because women have been bamboozled into equating liberation with sex instead of increased opportunity. At this point it’s a tight race to the bottom on who is dumber these days to me.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

False, on that we've been talking about it for ages we just didn't have an adequate scientific term attached to it

Fine.​

You never heard of folks talk about transmission of spiritual energy when engaging in intercourse

Only in science-fiction/fantasy novels and religious texts but that's a whole different thing than this. Never heard it discussed outside that context.​

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Wrong thread