Women DON'T Retain DNA From All Partners

Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
47,604
Reputation
3,539
Daps
116,816
Reppin
NULL
Just off past experience....chicks usually pick up traits from past partners

Thats why when a bytch really fw u....she start talking and acting like u. So I believe theres some truth to it

Its spelled out in all religious texts....sex is an exchange of bodies moreso for the receiver (the woman)

All Facts
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
47,604
Reputation
3,539
Daps
116,816
Reppin
NULL
False. It started in 2012......8 years ago.

Gained traction 5 years later on social media and been thrown around in various threads on here since then.​

Nah.. Farrakhan brought this up in old lecture..... no later than 2005..... He didn't go into the DNA aspect, but the spiritual piece of women letting random men shoot the club up..... and how that women would begin to behave or evoke certain emotions of past lovers she was in relationships with that were not of her normal character
 

CouldntBeMeTho

The Big Tuna
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
49,364
Reputation
23,156
Daps
278,920
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
False. It started in 2012......8 years ago.

Gained traction 5 years later on social media and been thrown around in various threads on here since then.​
You sir are a fukking idiot and you're dead wrong





Telegony is a theory of heredity holding that offspring can inherit the characteristics of a previous mate of the female parent; thus the child of a woman might partake of traits of a previous sexual partner. Experiments in the late 19th century on several species failed to provide evidence that offspring would inherit any character from their mother's previous mates.[1] It was superseded by the rediscovery of Mendelian inheritance and the Boveri–Sutton chromosome theory.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,010
Daps
122,436
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
John Brown said:
I just can't stand know-it-alls. One of the most annoying personality traits

Go back to ktt :camby:

I'm no 'know-it-all' and KTL is full of Liberals so, no.

What I take an interest in, I research until it is very familiar. I know a lot about those things only. You won't see me in sports threads, political threads, automotive threads, etc.

As I said before, your criticism is unwarranted. You have beef with me, there's better ways to handle it. You're acting like a little bytch right now.

Grow up, son.​
 

CouldntBeMeTho

The Big Tuna
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
49,364
Reputation
23,156
Daps
278,920
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
I'm no 'know-it-all' and KTL is full of Liberals so, no.

What I take an interest in, I research until it is very familiar. I know a lot about those things only. You won't see me in sports threads, political threads, automotive threads, etc.

As I said before, your criticism is unwarranted. You have beef with me, there's better ways to handle it. You're acting like a little bytch right now.

Grow up, son.​
You just gonna juelz around the fact that the idea of telegony is over 100 years old I see :laff:

Ain't no beef. I just don't like u
 

CouldntBeMeTho

The Big Tuna
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
49,364
Reputation
23,156
Daps
278,920
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
You, sir, didn't read the Wikipedia article you quoted.

'Traits'=/DNA you utter and complete buffoon.​

:laff::laff::laff:
Yes it does. The idea of telegony predates the discovery of dna. They were really searching for the answer to does female (of any species) having sex cause her to retain dna from her partners. Simple as that. You're wrong.

Plain as day you're wrong and can't even graciously admit it. And that's why I don't fukk with you you bytch
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,010
Daps
122,436
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
John Brown said:
Yes it does. The idea of telegony predates the discovery of dna.

And fell out of favor in the 19th Century....200 years ago.​

No one was talking about it whatsoever...and we're talking about DNA which wasn't even discovered yet.

Thanks for proving my point.​
 

CouldntBeMeTho

The Big Tuna
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
49,364
Reputation
23,156
Daps
278,920
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
And fell out of favor in the 19th Century....200 years ago.​

No one was talking about it whatsoever.​

Thanks for playing 'Spot the Idiot'.​
Which is totally irrelevant. I never said it was popular. Only that it's existed longer than 2012. Which is what you claim.

See how disengenuous you are. So sure that you're right, even when you're wrong. And then you'll juelz every little word to try to come out on top. :laff:

You're a piece of shyt
 
Top