JudgeJoeForilla
Richest Broke Ni99a You'll Never Meet

How many are jumping at the chance to commit to you full-time with marriage in sight![]()
How the hell do you assume that a woman has to have a man? You can imply it or believe it but you can't assume that every woman SHOULD have a man that's subjective it's an opinion, kind of like your opinion of how every man has to view women as a prize.Boy stop trying to prove your stupid ass point with lame ass comebacks. I'm single. I never said I wanted or was looking for a man. But of course u men up here assume every woman has to have a man.
What point do you think I'm trying to prove? I asked a question that you seem to be having a hard time answering, your deflections tell me all I need to know thoughBoy stop trying to prove your stupid ass point with lame ass comebacks. I'm single. I never said I wanted or was looking for a man. But of course u men up here assume every woman has to have a man.
I was trolling you, brehette.
HoweverWhy is she the prize? This has to be answered. Men typically approach women cause thats the way its always been, but it wasn't because she was a prize, cause
women were and are still subjugated all over the world. Short of abstinence or fukking themselves, women aren't approached because they are prizes, so much as because if we don't
approach them, we will usually be alone.
Women know this, say they don't have to go through the character development that "catching a prize" usually requires, and that assumes all women are prizes.
The correlation doesn't make sense unless a woman offers something the man can't find elsewhere. What makes a woman a prize?
What point do you think I'm trying to prove? I asked a question that you seem to be having a hard time answering, your deflections tell me all I need to know though![]()
She negged me cause I told her the truth. Until she changes her attitude and stop viewing women as little princess that need to be catered to she will never have a healthy relationship with a dude. An emotional action with the response "I'm single because I chose to be" is basically code for "I'm single because I can't get a man to put up with me" especially when you combine that with the fact that she claims she doesn't want a relationship but is up here posting about the dynamics in relation to male and female relationships. People who don't care for something this much don't put forth nearly as much energy arguing with strangers online about it let alone about something as trivial as who approaches who when.What point do you think I'm trying to prove? I asked a question that you seem to be having a hard time answering, your deflections tell me all I need to know though![]()
Where did you answer my question? I asked how many are jumping at the chance to be in a serious relationship with you full-time with marriage in the future. All you did was spew your nonsense and deflect, but continueYour comprehension is low. I answered your question. Reread.
Because the there's no real reasoning behind why she feels like that, truth is that lots of these women aren't the prize they feel they areShe negged me cause I told her the truth. Until she changes her attitude and stop viewing women as little princess that need to be catered to she will never have a healthy relationship with a dude. An emotional action with the response "I'm single because I chose to be" is basically code for "I'm single because I can't get a man to put up with me" especially when you combine that with the fact that she claims she doesn't want a relationship but is up here posting about the dynamics in relation to male and female relationships. People who don't care for something this much don't put forth nearly as much energy arguing with strangers online about it let alone about something as trivial as who approaches who when.
Is prize just a less degrading word for objectification to you? I ask this because you pretty much just linked women being a prize with the objectification of women in the bold. Being objectified is not the same as being deemed a prize being that being objectified does not raise a woman's value in men's eyes by any extent. As you said those men you're speaking on just want sex with those women, "sex" is the prize the woman in a sense is just the object of his lust. The body that the p*ssy is attached to. The only men who let a fat ass and pretty face dictate who they want to marry or be in a committed relationship with are extremely rich or simps. I'm only saying this because @At30wecashout pretty much explained that being a prize was the same as objectification and your post confirmed that belief on your behalf yet you're posting as if you've disproven him somehow...If I have to tell u why the woman is the prize than clearly you don't understand what damn near most men do.
A woman is the prize based off how men treat sex and relationships.
A man ask the woman out on the date to potentially be in a relationship with her, have fun with her, sex with her, etc. the man is always trying to get some from the woman, some meaning sex. Women are taught not to chase men. Why do u think? Because the man ain't the prize. A woman can always get another man in some aspect. Even if it's just sex. Look at how Yall put pretty women on a pedestal on this website than look at the salon or lipstick alley. Woman aren't checking for men to the extent men are.
Women don't base most of the things they do off of men. If a man is going to the club he ain't going to have a good time with his boys, he is going so him and his boys can find women they can potentially fukk. While women go to the club to have a good time whether it's meeting a man or having fun with the girls. No women are trying to pick up men from a club to fukk.
Shall I continue ...?
If I have to tell u why the woman is the prize than clearly you don't understand what damn near most men do.
A woman is the prize based off how men treat sex and relationships.
A man ask the woman out on the date to potentially be in a relationship with her, have fun with her, sex with her, etc. the man is always trying to get some from the woman, some meaning sex. Women are taught not to chase men. Why do u think? Because the man ain't the prize. A woman can always get another man in some aspect. Even if it's just sex. Look at how Yall put pretty women on a pedestal on this website than look at the salon or lipstick alley. Woman aren't checking for men to the extent men are.
Men also don't base "most things" off of women. Part of male bonding is the thrill of chasing women, so it can be you or any other girl, not because you are special, but because youWomen don't base most of the things they do off of men. If a man is going to the club he ain't going to have a good time with his boys, he is going so him and his boys can find women they can potentially fukk. While women go to the club to have a good time whether it's meeting a man or having fun with the girls. No women are trying to pick up men from a club to fukk.
Sure. This is interesting to speak about.Shall I continue ...?
@KinksandCoils
How do men treat sex and relationships? Is it any different than how women treat em? If so, how do men and women couple up if their
desires are fundamentally different, as you are asserting.
Do you not remember the days of families hoping to god they could marry off their daughter to a man of means so that they could share in his fortune? The woman was a bargaining chip
to go from poverty to prosperity. Women are not "chasing" because of the old world idea of being demure, respectful, submissive, and interestingly, chaste. Obviously a lot of women aren't interested
in hearing that anymore, so the very things that lead to "Men chasing women" doesn't apply to a lot of modern women, especially since you can be gainfully employed and enjoy the same freedom of
direction that men can. Lets not forget why cosmetics as they are currently used started as a way to attract men. Add the bustier, the stylist, etc. Literally to be chosen by men, in an era where women
did not work. Why? To have a family. Not because the woman is some great creature, but because loneliness isn't a perk of life.
You can say men aren't the prize NOW because you won't starve without one as in times past, but that only served to put greater parity between the genders. Women are getting chased because
thats how its always been, not because you are special. Part of being a man, because of how society deems it, was claiming a wife. No other reason. And women do check for men, yall just aren't
in the mindset of going after a mate, partially due to fear, and partially because its easier to let others do the work.
Men also don't base "most things" off of women. Part of male bonding is the thrill of chasing women, so it can be you or any other girl, not because you are special, but because you
are there. If you keep boiling things down to who is fukking, of course women aren't looking, hence why nobody is "impressed" by a woman who can bed a man. He likely did 90% of the work
to get to that point. She just made it known she had a vagina and nature took it's course. Unless a chick is a dime, what makes her a prize?
Sure. This is interesting to speak about.
Is prize just a less degrading word for objectification to you? I ask this because you pretty much just linked women being a prize with the objectification of women in the bold. Being objectified is not the same as being deemed a prize being that being objectified does not raise a woman's value in men's eyes by any extent. As you said those men you're speaking on just want sex with those women, "sex" is the prize the woman in a sense is just the object of his lust. The body that the p*ssy is attached to. The only men who let a fat ass and pretty face dictate who they want to marry or be in a committed relationship with are extremely rich or simps. I'm only saying this because @At30wecashout pretty much explained that being a prize was the same as objectification and your post confirmed that belief on your behalf yet you're posting as if you've disproven him somehow...