Would Brandon Jennings fit with the pacers?

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,992
Reputation
-3,427
Daps
59,860
Reppin
NULL
absolutely. He wouldnt have to carry as much of a scoring load. He's a capable creator himself and others. And most importantly he's a great ballhandler that can put pressure on the D, something Hill and Augustin couldnt do. That alone would make the PAcers much better, just having someone that can break down a defender and create easy opportunities for Hibbert and Young. He doesnt turn the ball over that often either.
 

No..Money..Mo..Problems

it is what it is
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
17,225
Reputation
-2,976
Daps
47,731
Reppin
Worldwide
Depends on how much he's asking. If he's only commanding 8-10 Mil than yes. They could trade George Hill who's making 8mil for Jennings. Jennings gets a bad rap for being a chucker when in reality everybody on the Bucks roster was offensively challenged except for Ellis and JJ who was only there for a couple of months.
 

Higher Tech

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
15,016
Reputation
2,380
Daps
39,588
Reppin
Gary, Indiana
i said this before

act_jose_calderon.jpg

:salute:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,260
Daps
279,780
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
and Mario Chalmers is:russ:

Mario Chalmers is being paid $4 million this season, Jennings is going to want near max, or at the very least a contract comparable to Steph Curry. Should he be paid as much as Curry?

Which would you rather have, Chalmers at $4 million knowing his role, or Jennings at $9-12 million thinking he's a star :ld: There's nothing Jennings does that is worth 3 times more than what Chalmers does.
 

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,992
Reputation
-3,427
Daps
59,860
Reppin
NULL
Jennings scoring efficiency is only garbage cause he's had to be a first option in Milwaukee, he could succeed as a 3rd option in Indy. They need someone that can break down defenses at the perimeter. He's also a pretty smart passer.
 

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,992
Reputation
-3,427
Daps
59,860
Reppin
NULL
Mario Chalmers is being paid $4 million this season, Jennings is going to want near max, or at the very least a contract comparable to Steph Curry.

Which would you rather have, Chalmers at $4 million knowing his role, or Jennings at $9-12 million thinking he's a star :ld: There's nothing Jennings does that is worth 3 times more than what Chalmers does.

:russ:at paying Jennings max. If he wants that, fukk him. But I thought he said wants to win, and no contenders can afford to pay him max and shouldnt.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,260
Daps
279,780
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
:russ:at paying Jennings max. If he wants that, fukk him. But I thought he said wants to win, and no contenders can afford to pay him max and shouldnt.

Gery Woelfel's agent sources claim Milwaukee Bucks point guard Brandon Jennings wants to play in a big market and was seeking the maximum $14 - $14.5 million per year during extension negotiations last fall. Yet another chapter to add to the Jennings/Bucks co-authored book of speculation.

:scusthov:

For comparison, Steph Curry will be getting $9.8 million next season.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
267,181
Reputation
35,422
Daps
816,173
Reppin
Goatganda the pearl of Africa
Mario Chalmers is being paid $4 million this season, Jennings is going to want near max, or at the very least a contract comparable to Steph Curry. Should he be paid as much as Curry?

Which would you rather have, Chalmers at $4 million knowing his role, or Jennings at $9-12 million thinking he's a star :ld: There's nothing Jennings does that is worth 3 times more than what Chalmers does.

honestly i dont get the hate for chalmers

give chalmers 35mpg and him controlling the offense like most point guards you would probably get like 17 points and 8 assists per game with 45% shooting and 38% from the 3

ive said it before hes like ron harper on teh bulls, when ron harper was avg like 9 points and 4 assists

when just a few years before he was avg like 20 points and 5 assists per game
 

mozichrome

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
90,585
Reputation
4,563
Daps
132,792
Reppin
NULL
Jennings scoring efficiency is only garbage cause he's had to be a first option in Milwaukee, he could succeed as a 3rd option in Indy. They need someone that can break down defenses at the perimeter. He's also a pretty smart passer.

1 article said pacers might have 6 million dollars to spend in FA, is Jennings gonna take that big a pay cut?
 

No..Money..Mo..Problems

it is what it is
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
17,225
Reputation
-2,976
Daps
47,731
Reppin
Worldwide
absolutely. He wouldnt have to carry as much of a scoring load. He's a capable creator himself and others. And most importantly he's a great ballhandler that can put pressure on the D, something Hill and Augustin couldnt do. That alone would make the PAcers much better, just having someone that can break down a defender and create easy opportunities for Hibbert and Young. He doesnt turn the ball over that often either.

Exactly. A guy like Jennings can actually help the Pacers. He had to take tough shots with the roster Milwaukee had. Trading Hill for Jennings is only gonna cost the Pacers an extra 2 or 3 mil and Jennings can provide some offense which they badly need and he can take care of the ball better than Hill.
 

richtree

Top Shotta, None Hotta!
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
5,113
Reputation
568
Daps
10,005
Reppin
At the top.
i said this before

act_jose_calderon.jpg

Gotta co-sign this. He's a good passer and takes care of the ball. His jumper and free throw shooting would be great assets to the Pacers as well. Yeah he's a liability on defense but as a team the Pacers can probably mask his inefficiencies.
 
Top