Would people be against another brand split?

[Bob-omb]

The brand split should happen after this next wave of NXT callups.

I'd say no brand specific PPVs and titles. They can have it where the champions appear on whatever show they (creative) want.

And I definitely agree with HHH running SD. Competition within the organization should lead to better shows.

 

[I-Hate-You]

Brand split is trash.

 

[23Barrettcity]

Uso's, Christian, Dallas and slater weren't going to make that that rumble 1% better. Cena and Rollins were just in a title match so traditionally they wouldn't be in the rumble nor should they. Orton and Sheamus are now prized talent? , people would complain about them just like they did Kane and Show

But they make the overall show better with their inclusions plus some of those guys would be given a chance to shine . I can imagine bo being a heel ic champ winning all the time by shenanigans and building up the title . It would be a if boost with the extra tv and newfound importance of smackdown

 

[Kill Dat Noize]

right because the show was sooo good these last few years before they unified the titles and ended the brand split.

3 hours of raw and 2 hours of smackdown makes for 5 hours of primetime television each week. that's more than enough time to display your entire roster and give guys the right platform to get themselves over. you don't need to revolve every show around the same guys every week.

the brand split just dilutes the product and devalues the titles even further.

 

[23Barrettcity]

Brand split is trash.

How is the brand split trash qualitywise that was one of the best times for wwe

 

[23Barrettcity]

right because the show was sooo good these last few years before they unified the titles and ended the brand split.

3 hours of raw and 2 hours of smackdown makes for 5 hours of primetime television each week. that's more than enough time to display your entire roster and give guys the right platform to get themselves over. you don't need to revolve every show around the same guys every week.

the brand split just dilutes the product and devalues the titles even further.

That's not true man . It kept the product fresh like it's own territory

 

[Kill Dat Noize]

if they ever do reconsider a brand split i imagine it is so that they don't have to worry about writing themselves into a corner come rumble time.

it was probably easier for them to choose rumble winners with confidence back when they had a choice to contend for either title. but now that there's only one belt, you have to be very selective with who you end up giving that spot to. there's only so many guys that could headline a title match at wrestlemania. edge, del rio... A LOT of guys wouldn't have been trusted with the rumble win had there been only one championship.

but of course rather than restructure and rebuild from the ground up, and actually try and develop legitimate stars... they WOULD apply a band-aid and go back to a brand split.

 

[Kill Dat Noize]

That's not true man . It kept the product fresh like it's own territory

i never really bought the brand split. it always felt like 2 conferences in the same league, rather than 2 opposing companies.

 

[Notorious 1 E.Y.E.]

either way im still not watching smackdown
they cant even do a 3hr raw properly

 

[Dog Based Gremlin]

The fukkery

 

[Playaz Eyez]

Cause no one has faith in the writers. Good-great wrestling is nothing if the booking and character development is shytty. Just remember the last brand split, Khali and Jack Swagger became champions, Heidenreich and Orlando Jordan were feuding, "The Reflection of Perfection" Mark Jindrak, The Heartthrobs, The dikks, The Highlanders, foot fetish Snitsky, Kenzo Suzuki, among others