Would you rather be a billionaire in 1917 or making 100k a year in 2017?:

[The Amerikkkan Idol]

Its funny how the idea of using the 100k for school or invest it in a business to be making 7 figure with a 100k bonus is far fetch by going back in time to invent shyt they have no idea about or how life is for that matter is a better idea.

Exactly, we have all of the knowledge of the past and the internet at our disposal

We could get more accomplished in 5 minutes than JP Morgan or somebody could in like a month

 

[dem bath salts]

I'd take risk of the billy. But this shyt ain't gonna go sweet. I gotta get a personal army quick and I cant trust my money with any banks. Probably need to be a billionaire in land and resources rather than cash. Best bet is to probably get with an african muslim nation and try and make ties wirh the arab world and hope for some fake as brorhers of Islam shyt.

 

[UberEatsDriver]

I don’t think many of the delusional posters really know what life was like in those days. People would take shyts in the street and not wash their hands

 

[UberEatsDriver]

After what happened to Black Wall Street why would anyone pick 1917?

And most of you people making up ideas are only saying it because of what you see today.

Y’all know damn well y’all wouldn’t buy no states, Africa or NBA lmao.

1917 was lame. shyt was boring as f*ck. Ain’t nobody doing sh*t back then.

I could only imagine how life in the Caribbean was. Oh yea I forgot most of us were stil under daddy named Europe.

 

[Take It In Blood]

I like technology and wouldn't survive in 1917, even with billions and any woman I want


Id rather have the 100k

 

[13473]

100k now is like 14k in 1917.
1 billion back then is roughly equal to 7.2 billion today

i'll take the billion and all the cons that come with the early 1900s. that rich i'm not staying in america.

i could probably just buy some land & build my own lil country