I fukking hate all reviewers. Most of them wanted to be iggy pop or 2pac but ended up writing about musc because theyre talentless. Pitchfork is the worst though. Bunch of liberal arts school educated elitists. If they were around in the late 80s you can be sure theyd be the ones making arguments on how Public Enemy is not music, or in the 90s telling us biggie is not real hop hop.
idk, you've basically grouped the opinions you don't like into one source. what I mean is you won't find too many people that say "PE isn't music" and then say "Biggie isn't hip-hop". most of the people that were critical of 'gangster rap' in the 90's were fans of social-conscious music like PE. in fact there's a direct connection in that Chuck D sued Primo because he didn't want his voice being used in a song about crack


...I've officially lost all respect for the institution of professional music review, critics are too prone to the fancy of trend and hipster dikkridery of the day...dude announcing he was gay a week before the album dropped is up there with the greatest and most effective publicity stunts of all time
at the reviewer.
at it being anywhere near as good as Voodoo, Brown Sugar, Miseducation of Lauryn Hill etc. let alone Innervisions, What's Going On.