Samoa Joe in TNA, he was fun to watch chasing the belt against Angle. Once he won it he had a barely memorable 4 month run as champ and never got the chance to be champion again after that.
I would actually say that Joe, when booked correctly, is a great champion (see his ROH Title reign) due to his versatility at promos. When called for, he can do the whole cool and collected champion bit, then go in the ring and prove why he has reason to be so confident.
But I was watching some Samoa Joe promos from the 2005-2007 period, and goddamn was he great at being the angry, chasing babyface. It helped that he was such a great promo guy, probably the only guy left that actually knows how to properly deliver a screaming promo.
I mean, when he gave us this before his match with Jeff Jarrett (non-title, because we couldn't have Sting NOT winning the belt at Bound For Glory in 2006):
TNA: Jeff Jarrett Bloodies Samoa Joe - YouTube
All I could think was, "This man should have absolutely killed Jeff Jarrett and won the World Title, and why he didn't, I have no idea." We forget due to about 3 years lost via stupidity, sciatica, and lost motivation, but at one point, Joe was legitimately the best and most complete wrestler in the world. The first year and a half run to the belt was great, GREAT stuff, and he could've been the breakout star TNA needed if they had just put the belt on him at BFG that year.
But of course, that didn't happen.
A slightly independent question: We talk about great chasers (The best since I started watching in no order: Sting, Goldberg, Rock, Austin, Jeff Hardy, Diamond Dallas Page, Joe from his TNA debut until 2007, possibly Homicide in ROH and heel Randy Orton. Mark Henry's 2011 run to the title was so short and sudden that I'm not sure that I want to include him, but that was excellent stuff as well), but not really about what MAKES a great chaser. So I'm posing that question:
In your opinion, what makes for a great title chaser? I have two main criteria, that are no way exhaustive, but I feel are absolutely necessary to be great at chasing:
1). You need to be a special kind of over. You can't just be a regularly over guy who gets loud pops, rather, you need to have a unique type of charisma that draws people in and makes them invest in you (Beyond the megastar types, DDP and Jeff Hardy had this down pat).
2). The people have to believe that the chaser can win, which also means that the result should always be in some sort of doubt. See the Jeff Hardy case study; when I watched his chase unfold, while it always seemed like he should win, it never seemed like a foregone conclusion. In fact, it felt like his chance could disappear with a hard gust of wind, at times. For actual foregone conclusions (Like Sting chasing Hogan), the threat needs to be so huge that a protracted chase seems necessary for the chaser to win.
Every great chaser, I believe, satisfied these two conditions in spades. What do you guys think are the conditions that create great chasers?