WSJ: How a Weakened ESPN Became Consumed by Politics

[Rekkapryde]

If espn wasn't gonna pay for the nba then CBS Fox or NBC would have. Period.

Live sports programming is still a premium as these networkz fight for content

 

[panopticon]

If espn wasn't gonna pay for the nba then CBS Fox or NBC would have. Period.

Live sports programming is still a premium as these networkz fight for content

Sometimes the best deal is the deal you don't do.

"We lose money on every sale...but we'll make it up in volume!"

-Every failed business, ever

 

[El Bombi]

Corny and terrible jokes like these two lames are the reason ESPN is trash.

I would like to punch these two lames in the face.

 

[Anerdyblackguy]

Yeah, no way Jemele hill is staying for the long term.

 

[Optimus Prime]

Hate the "ESPN is losing subscribers" narrative because it's pretty much impossible without cutting cable as a whole. Such lazy journalism. These articles make it seem that ESPN politics is the sole reason why millions of subscribers are getting rid of cable. It can't be because normal cable bills are in the hundreds of dollars per month. It has to be because of Jemele Hill. WSJ ain't slick either with the timing of this article right after Jemele gets Journalist of the Year from NABJ.