Nintendough
#Kliq
Best for Biz 
WWE Data Proves Pushing Goldberg Is Best For Business
- Thread starter Bonefan32
- Start date
Breh Obama
First Breh President. Coli Prophet.
I've been saying this for months......this shyt ain't about Goldberg
It's about making Brock champ at WM just so Roman Reigns can beat him to not only be the only other person to beat Brock but to become Universal Champ as well...
This is all an elaborate plan to elevate (notice I didn't say put over) Roman
It's about making Brock champ at WM just so Roman Reigns can beat him to not only be the only other person to beat Brock but to become Universal Champ as well...
This is all an elaborate plan to elevate (notice I didn't say put over) Roman
Vince GOATsso proven right again, the real draws in this business are those that look like stars and have that larger than life persona
All these indie b*stards haven't drew a dime, just surviving on the WWE name itself to stay afloat. Takes names like Brock and Goldberg to revive things
All these indie b*stards haven't drew a dime, just surviving on the WWE name itself to stay afloat. Takes names like Brock and Goldberg to revive things
Brock/Goldberg is good bookingstars are made from good booking which wwe can't seem to do
and leave Dean out out of this he draws more than Roman
Amor fati
Superstar
Exactly. Goldberg is a draw right now but what does WWE always pushing oldfukk part timers at the top of the card say about their ability to create new stars? He's good for business right now but eventually those casual fans tuning in to see Goldberg will figure out that the guy is really old and only has two moves if you expose him too much.
WWE is going to squeeze every bit of 'hey, remember this guy from 17 years ago when wrestling was at its peak?' nostalgia that they can, but once that's over because those guys are all too old, then what's the plan? Who can you honestly say that WWE has created in the last ten years that is a genuine draw and can headline a record-setting Wrestlemania?
are you stupid? Who do you want the WWE to push instead of the legit stars like Goldberg and Brock, who actually move the needle in the ratings. AJ, Owens and Mr. Miyagi aren't drawing in one extra person to the product, regardless where they are on the card.
Where did I say anything about AJ and Owens? Brock and Goldberg are stars because they come from an era where the booking got guys over and old guys were fed to young guys, not vice versa. No one in this era can rise to that level if you keep making them look weaker than the old guys.
Take the time to read before you start typing emotional garbage, you farm animal-fukking cac.
you're dumb enough to blame the booking?
These indie scrubs have been pushed and promoted to the moon and back, they're just not over with the casuals (where the real money is), it's a lost generation of charisma
They're 'pushed to the moon' in an era of scripted promos that never get any faces over, and make every single heel the exact same wimp. Kevin Owens 'push to the moon' made him the weakest and most cowardly champion since 2001 Jericho despite his best work being as a tough guy bully type who didn't back down from anything.
They're not over with the handful of remaining casuals because the booking is trash, not because they don't have charisma. No amount of smileys you post will change that.
You frankly just seem stuck in the 90s, using buzzwords like 'real stars' to describe guys who should be putting people over at this point in their careers.
CJ
Your objective semi-troll
Just in for the fukkery breh. Should have died after SS imo.
Box Cutta
Bumbling Sidekick
we eating now 