WWE PLE’s headed to ESPN starting in 2026

DaylitoJames

#SnitchGang Elite
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
99,305
Reputation
33,158
Daps
313,062
Reppin
Sneak Nation

:picard: I gotta dig up my old Justin.tv links
SQv.gif
 

drifter

Superstar
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
6,352
Reputation
3,375
Daps
24,455
This sounds fukking stupid for various reasons.

1. WWE has made it a point for 10 years now to kill the PPV platform. First it was $9.99 per month with WWE Network, and when that was launching, they were actively calling fans who paid full price for normal PPV through cable providers fukking idiots on TV weekly. Then the move to Peacock, which was even cheaper, and is included free for most Xfinity internet packages.

2. Money wise, its the about the same as the Peacock deal....for WWE/TKO. For fans that want to watch WWE that have been trained for a decade to not pay more than $10 a month for PPVs and the back catalogue (and then all the catalogue on Peacock PLUS all the NBC Universal programming over a dozen channels, tons of live sports, big movies, big TV, etc) for half that, now expected to pay triple for....shytty ESPN programming that everyone has hated for 15 years? The same ESPN that has been on the verge of going under for years and has fired nearly all their on air talent besides SAS and for some reason the worst hot taker I've ever seen in my life in Perk?

3. I'm sure TKO will end up using the UFC model and doing pay for ESPN streamer and then PPV costs on top of that.

They're gonna make their money, shareholders gonna be happy, but a bunch of fans and especially younger fans that they need to keep the thing going for years are not going to be able to get their parents to spring for $30 a month for ESPN The Ocho+ AND the what, almost $20 a month for Netflix just for their mark ass kids to watch WWE. Over 5 years, that will make a negative impact on business. They just keep making shyt harder and worse to seek out and watch with every new deal. They've basically abandoned back catalogue on Netflix and I would not imagine they'll be uploading anything beyond Hogan and Attitude Eras on ESPN.

There's no way having cable ESPN will get you the streaming service for free. I think people are misreading. The new ESPN + will have a live stream of the cable network and all the content, and you can with the service you can get full ESPN without having to have cable or Hulu/Disney+/Youtube TV. Not that if you have cable with ESPN, you'll get the streaming on the house.



I'm retired from interacting with 99% of this board and really IWC as a whole. The only exception being pics threads. It's made viewing wrestling a lot better not being part of echo chambers or reading shyt daily by people with mental needs. But when I saw the news I had to come here and...y'all didn't disappoint

Wrestling fans have this innate ability, whether here, Reddit, Twitter, doesn't matter where, to be completely and totally wrong on anything and everything outside the bubble of wrestling. Including the business of wrestling. Then double down on the mental gymnastics and conclusions that only ever existed in their heads. It's like you all have opinions you think these company need to follow on TV weekly, now you know better than execs handling billion dollar grossing entities for a living. It isn't just a TKO, you all did the same thing with Vince.

This guy and a lot of the rest of you thinking you have one brain cell to offer Nick Khan about his handlings is wild. IWC said the Netflix deal was bad, they'll cancel the deal because of Vince, other shyt you came up with hyperventilating off scenarios you made up. Raw is consistently a top viewed program for Netflix. Let the IWC tell it, wrestling fans have been priced out, they're still selling out venues and hitting near sellouts. At the very least the shows are fuller than 2019 while costing more, while a depression is coming off of Trump. How can Nick Khan be wrong about so much and the IWC be right about it all, yet Nick's the one signing these billion dollar deals and the price structures so far are working, while IWC ain't been asked to sign shyt. They just keep waiting for the next boogeyman that'll "sink the ship". Thought that kind of shyt was supposed to stop with Vince...yeah

Anyway man, carry on. I just thought it was crazy reading comments here and elsewhere about things nobody outside Nick/Ari have the data or enough insight to be having opinions on, having opinions. Not even defending money hunger, if the shyt ain't for you cool then let them know and not watch. Let the ones that actually have an idea about 2030 in 2025 worry about what things look like in 5 years.

If things don't work they'll feel it. They seem to think they'll be fine and if I'm honest they most likely will be. People in the "just watching WWE" category on Netflix & Peacock are most likely few and between. This is aimed to hook more casuals by putting wrestling right next to real sports and further legitimize wrestling as sport instead of just the carnival with steel chairs. But until then when things stop working, take the rest of the summer off and kick your feet up tiger.
 

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,668
Reputation
1,399
Daps
31,545
Reppin
Indiana


I'm retired from interacting with 99% of this board and really IWC as a whole. The only exception being pics threads. It's made viewing wrestling a lot better not being part of echo chambers or reading shyt daily by people with mental needs. But when I saw the news I had to come here and...y'all didn't disappoint

Wrestling fans have this innate ability, whether here, Reddit, Twitter, doesn't matter where, to be completely and totally wrong on anything and everything outside the bubble of wrestling. Including the business of wrestling. Then double down on the mental gymnastics and conclusions that only ever existed in their heads. It's like you all have opinions you think these company need to follow on TV weekly, now you know better than execs handling billion dollar grossing entities for a living. It isn't just a TKO, you all did the same thing with Vince.

This guy and a lot of the rest of you thinking you have one brain cell to offer Nick Khan about his handlings is wild. IWC said the Netflix deal was bad, they'll cancel the deal because of Vince, other shyt you came up with hyperventilating off scenarios you made up. Raw is consistently a top viewed program for Netflix. Let the IWC tell it, wrestling fans have been priced out, they're still selling out venues and hitting near sellouts. At the very least the shows are fuller than 2019 while costing more, while a depression is coming off of Trump. How can Nick Khan be wrong about so much and the IWC be right about it all, yet Nick's the one signing these billion dollar deals and the price structures so far are working, while IWC ain't been asked to sign shyt. They just keep waiting for the next boogeyman that'll "sink the ship". Thought that kind of shyt was supposed to stop with Vince...yeah

Anyway man, carry on. I just thought it was crazy reading comments here and elsewhere about things nobody outside Nick/Ari have the data or enough insight to be having opinions on, having opinions. Not even defending money hunger, if the shyt ain't for you cool then let them know and not watch. Let the ones that actually have an idea about 2030 in 2025 worry about what things look like in 5 years.

If things don't work they'll feel it. They seem to think they'll be fine and if I'm honest they most likely will be. People in the "just watching WWE" category on Netflix & Peacock are most likely few and between. This is aimed to hook more casuals by putting wrestling right next to real sports and further legitimize wrestling as sport instead of just the carnival with steel chairs. But until then when things stop working, take the rest of the summer off and kick your feet up tiger.

Sorry bro I was literally reading the press releases and all the info on it and it all says the opposite of what WWE told Ariel. Even in that quote, he says "it appears", but you know what it also appears? That everything else says the opposite. Only wrestling outlets are saying it will be free if you have an ESPN sub either. Every other financial outlet and ESPN/Disney's press releases do not say that and clearly refer to it as an OTT service that will include ESPN tv for the first time. For the sake of argument, let's say you DO have a sub to ESPN in some form and it does work out that way....that sub is probably more expensive than just the new ESPN thing, what a deal.
 
Last edited:

drifter

Superstar
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
6,352
Reputation
3,375
Daps
24,455
Sorry bro I was literally reading the press releases and all the info on it and it all says the opposite of what WWE told Ariel. Even in that quote, he says "it appears", but you know what it also appears? That everything else says the opposite. Everything else except that clip of Ariel says it will be an OTT subscription and that the linear ESPN TV networks and content will be available on the OTT subscription even as a stand alone, no other cable or streaming packages. Maybe they'll run a discount the first 6-12 months, nothing in any other press release or article says anyone with cable ESPN gets the new streaming package free.
Nothing you gotta apologize for. Like I said, if you don't like what they're doing it's cool, voice that. If it doesn't work they'll inevitably have to work towards the middle and closer to you, but relax.

And no. What ended up happening today is exactly what ends up happening anytime WWE or wrestling news involving something other booking and is bigger than the wrestling bubble comes up. And that's because the world through the wrestling bubble is the only thing IWC understands.

Take a look at the first two posts in this thread, the vague details, and the nanosecond reactions right after. Nobody was interested in finding out more, what exactly's happening, and putting a complete picture together. Only thing we know is WWE, more money, and I hate it. That's all we need for 275 posts. 275 posts of the same 7-8 people left on this dead board not knowing wtf they're talking about. When if people take a step outside of the wrestling bubble and look at news, you'd see the WWE announcement is part of even bigger news. It's continuously happened since WWE was acquired and TKO has worked to move and to be accepted outside the wrestling bubble. The announcement was clear if you read actual press releases and not tweets from wrestling blogs farming engagement.

Now to get to the specifics of the deal, like I said I'm not arguing for companies raising prices on consumers. But I'm not an idiot either and if I was calling the shots, I can't see how I'd move any different than Nick has. IWC took time out of complaining about HHH booking, looked at the tweets with no details behind them, saw $20 more and said, "Well I'm already unhappy with WWE for X and now this, this is the end" which is what this shyt thread is full of.

I'd argue most casuals looked at the news, probably saw "ESPN" & "NFL" first, then saw WWE and thought "I'm paying $11 for WWE on Peacock now. For $19 more I still get that but get all this NFL stuff they're throwing in too." Either that or they're already on the peripheral of being an ESPN DTC sub and this is what helps get them in. That's the difference. So the question to me isn't what the IWC thinks because people in this thread and in Reddit still think they're bigger than the bubble they are. The question is, can ESPN still charge $29.99 if WWE was not bundled in? I think I know the answer and I think you do too. Even besides being a cable sub right now, most people would argue WWE is a throw in for added value to the NFL/ESPN partnership. That's just reality, that says nothing about added hoops to view the big shows though. Then again most people huffing & puffing in here have been asking for links for years, all this extra shyt is performative.
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,186
Reputation
2,110
Daps
68,815
Reppin
Everywhere
Looks like it's free through Cable Providers. I have Sling I share so we Gucci. But the value was in the library and now it's all over the place.

But if you're an all in cord cutter you probably have a online cable service your paying for along with Netflix so it's not to bad.
 

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,668
Reputation
1,399
Daps
31,545
Reppin
Indiana
It's not huffing and puffing, it fukking sucks for fans to break apart all their shows onto different platforms you have to pay for separately and much more than when it was all on WWE Network or Peacock. Everyone that wants to watch WWE is going to have to pay way more and across multiple platforms to watch everything 8 months ago they could watch on one platform for 2/3rds the price. Who the fukk is that good for besides the shareholders?

ESPN for PPVs that you either need to have an existing ESPN that you're paying for which is almost surely more than what the $30 is (and that's only for launch subscribers and only for the first 12 months, it absolutely will jump after those 12 months like your internet promos). Or, $30 a month for the PPVs even if you don't give a shyt about any of the other sports.

Raw on Netflix for $12-19 depending on tier and seems to go up every 9 months with less and less other content you might want to watch.

Smackdown on cable and Peacock for another 4 years.

NXT at least is free to watch day after on CW's website. For now.

And then the idea that back catalogue is up for grabs and could go anywhere that will pay, but outside of Youtube, none of the free services like Pluto/Tubi (both of which would be fine for the back catalogue, particularly pre 90s stuff) do not keep content permanently and so it could disappear at any time or rotate like the old 24/7 classics shyt.

How is this better for any fan not even a year ago could watch all of it in one place for one, much, much cheaper price? Kids into this shyt now that want to watch every show having to have 4 different subscriptions just to watch what they could have on normal TV before January and all of it on Peacock before that. That shyt is a fukking bummer and most of us would have completely fallen off as kids if shyt was split up like that.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
75,044
Reputation
13,702
Daps
263,300
Reppin
206 & 734
siding with espn and wwe with "i'd do the same thing" is some tier zero bootlicking. Imagine the cognitive dissonance to say "we'll they'll figure it out". WTF is this shyt?

you're getting the same content/service for more money and no value added, and you have to add another service to get the same content. Why would you be cool with this :dahell:
 
Top