It ain't shyt, breh. It's literally as shytty as Raw. The only differences are that it's blue and has an hour less of content to fill. People acting like SD is this great show just being silly and trying to convince themselves that they made the right choice of show to watch. It's the same show of awkward promos from wrestlers and GMs, heatless matches that go nowhere, and giving away PPV matches on TV for no reason. Literally the only difference are a different McMahon, ti's blue, and it is 2 hours instead of 3.
Not exactly,...
It is obvious one is more sports entertainment based and the other is what WWE would say is more workrate extensive.
with a slight mix of those WWE smashmouth main event sports entertainment properties to satiate both style of viewers.
Both have their key principals and split of WWE psychology and braintrust executed in both styles.
That WWE would like to capitalize on draw wise.
to satiate the diverse style of content of the current wrestling viewer.
Raw illustrates the mix of wcw meets wwf clique rules meets sports entertainment drawing based era content. That was ushered in by the five star sports entertainment finish of scsa/mick Foley and out of relevance as a draw.
from low quality in the post attitude boom to the my dear son-in law ruthless aggression and beyond era.
Where WWE committed to the smash mouth main event neutered workrate style booking from an injured scsa attitude era. That is more conducive to the son-in-law's maximum workrate skill and output.
While smack down illustrates the more workrate extensive style booking.
from the Indy heroes who saved wrasslin post the end of the attitude era boom.
That the WWE shunned for more than a decade post the conclusion of the attitude boom era. Which the son in law ushered in with the errant booking decision to go over rock and Foley at mania 2000.
Art Barr