Xbox Series X full specs revealed

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
51,723
Reputation
13,189
Daps
129,849
There is no way, with Sony's track record, that they won't have a killer exclusive.

Even if they don't have a day one exclusive...you can bet that within the first year, there will be some heavy hitters.

Sony doesn't usually come out the gate with hot exclusives tho
That Series X GPU ain’t fukkin wit my 2080ti brotha. It’s killing the 1070 tho. shyt is gonna be a 2070 equivalent. Maybe closer to 2070 Super. And that’s great. Unless u on the high end of PC gaming the best gaming value would be a Series X over a mid tier PC unless u like customization.
Which is kinda crazy, I feel like this is the 1st time this has happen in the console space.


My Xbox literally is gonna be better than my gaming pc unless I upgrade my graphics card which at that point would cost almost as much as an Xbox and future proof my for a uncertain amount of time.
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
23,744
Reputation
5,339
Daps
67,075
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
Sony doesn't usually come out the gate with hot exclusives tho

Which is kinda crazy, I feel like this is the 1st time this has happen in the console space.


My Xbox literally is gonna be better than my gaming pc unless I upgrade my graphics card which at that point would cost almost as much as an Xbox and future proof my for a uncertain amount of time.

Killzone is big but not what I'd consider a heavy hitter. They wait till the installed base is far larger. Only so many games push console sales. I think the last exclusive one in quite some time is breath of the wild. FPS games are good showcase games though. I would expect one from them at launch.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,789
Reputation
8,290
Daps
114,980
\
Sony doesn't usually come out the gate with hot exclusives tho

Which is kinda crazy, I feel like this is the 1st time this has happen in the console space.


My Xbox literally is gonna be better than my gaming pc unless I upgrade my graphics card which at that point would cost almost as much as an Xbox and future proof my for a uncertain amount of time.
PS3/360 was a good value at the time of release.

1364849716655ips1c.jpg
 

Barney Rubble

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,935
Reputation
3,820
Daps
22,488
Reppin
NULL
again, the difference between both the alleged 9TF and 12TF is even smaller than the PS4 and Xbox One.

FOV is always the same on both consoles. That from what I've seen never been changeable for console games so that's not even worth bringing up. It's going to be very negligible. People just love to over exaggerate online because of fanboyish reasons. I already game on PC and seen the differences and once you're up past 1440P the differences start to get smaller.

Games on PS4 Pro like Spider-Man or God of War or UC4 has looked as good or even better than games I've played on PC. The power differences even there resulted in from CPU and higher res which cleans up the image which will not be an issue for next gen.
I've seen you post this shyt for years, and serious question, when's the last time you had your eyes checked? Those games do look great for the relative power of the PS4 Pro, but they don't compare to PC. They are 30fps, with motion blur :scust:next to no aliasing, low graphics settings, tiny FOV, short draw distance etc etc and don't look native 4k. I have two 2080ti's in SLI, a 240hz 1080p monitor, a 144hz 4k monitor, and the LG C9 Oled(the best gaming TV period) I've also owned a 1440p 165hz asus, and I can absolutely tell the difference between 4k and those lower resolutions. It's so much blurrier in comparison. I'm sure these consoles will be a nice step up, but 3TF will make a difference.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: PS4

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
66,084
Reputation
10,549
Daps
221,045
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
and the thing is that 12Tf is the theoretical output of the GPU. it could still be limited by power, thermal, and other factors
Yup. We still gotta see the full potential of the CPU because while AMD is murdering Intel on the productivity end with their CPU’s. For gaming there’s still some catching up to do and this is even with AMD’s best CPU. shyt still barely edges out a 9900k. And their GPU’s definitely haven’t caught up to Nvidia yet.
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
66,084
Reputation
10,549
Daps
221,045
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
I've seen you post this shyt for years, and serious question, when's the last time you had your eyes checked? Those games do look great for the relative power of the PS4 Pro, but they don't compare to PC. They are 30fps, with motion blur :scust:next to no aliasing, low graphics settings, tiny FOV, short draw distance etc etc and don't look native 4k. I have two 2080ti's in SLI, a 240hz 1080p monitor, a 144hz 4k monitor, and the LG C9 Oled(the best gaming TV period) I've also owned a 1440p 165hz asus, and I can absolutely tell the difference between 4k and those lower resolutions. It's so much blurrier in comparison. I'm sure these consoles will be a nice step up, but 3TF will make a difference.
I have a 2080ti and would much rather play at 1440p or 1800p and gain the performance.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,789
Reputation
8,290
Daps
114,980
I've seen you post this shyt for years, and serious question, when's the last time you had your eyes checked? Those games do look great for the relative power of the PS4 Pro, but they don't compare to PC. They are 30fps, with motion blur :scust:next to no aliasing, low graphics settings, tiny FOV, short draw distance etc etc and don't look native 4k. I have two 2080ti's in SLI, a 240hz 1080p monitor, a 144hz 4k monitor, and the LG C9 Oled(the best gaming TV period) I've also owned a 1440p 165hz asus, and I can absolutely tell the difference between 4k and those lower resolutions. It's so much blurrier in comparison. I'm sure these consoles will be a nice step up, but 3TF will make a difference.
I didn't say there's no difference between the two, I said that in most cases when I'm able to go from 4K/60fps to a higher refresh rate ultra wide I'm picking that. I rather play say Gears on my 21:9 100hz Monitor at 100fps than on 4K/60fps. I can tell it's clearer and I think it looks amazing but great image quality isn't the only thing that makes a game look amazing. That's why I said some of the best looking games include some PS4 games because overall it was impressive(facial animations, animations in general etc.)

I think something like TLOU PT 2 in 1440P looks better than say The Witcher 3 or FFXV at native 4K/60fps on PC. Those games have amazing image quality and framerate but the overall game logic is worse and that's not something a beefier video card can fix.
 
Last edited:

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
66,084
Reputation
10,549
Daps
221,045
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
I didn't say there's no difference between the two, I said that in most cases when I'm able to go from 4K/60fps to a higher refresh rate ultra wide I'm picking that. I rather play say Gears on my 21:9 100hz Monitor at 100fps than on 4K/60fps. I can tell it's clearer and I think it looks amazing but great image quality isn't the only thing that makes a game look amazing. That's why I said some of the best looking games include some PS4 games because overall it was impressive(facial animations, animations in general etc.)

I think something like TLOU PT 2 in 1440P looks better than say The Witcher 3 or FFXV at native 4K/60fps on PC. Those games have amazing image quality and framerate but the overall game logic is worse and that's not something a beefier video card can fix.
All true. I honestly think framerate effects visuals far more than any resolution after 1440p.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,789
Reputation
8,290
Daps
114,980
All true. I honestly think framerate effects visuals far more than any resolution after 1440p.
It's like this to me:

Any game that's on console can obviously look WAY better on a stronger PC, I don't dispute that.

but some games can look really good on consoles that make me go damn for a console game this shyt is impressive.

Like who's going to see this and go


Meh it's not really native 4K and 30fps? Like come on. If Horizon come out for PC then I'm sure it'll look even better but for the PS4 it was damn good graphics.


I know what high framerate is like I have a high FPS monitor but for what I'm playing on it's damn good. I don't care about comparing it to PC it'll never be comparable. It's like a lunch you make at home that's really good, it may not be as good as a high end restaurant meal but hey this shyt is good for how cheap I made it.
 

Barney Rubble

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,935
Reputation
3,820
Daps
22,488
Reppin
NULL
I didn't say there's no difference between the two, I said that in most cases when I'm able to go from 4K/60fps to a higher refresh rate ultra wide I'm picking that. I rather play say Gears on my 21:9 100hz Monitor at 100fps than on 4K/60fps. I can tell it's clearer and I think it looks amazing but great image quality isn't the only thing that makes a game look amazing. That's why I said some of the best looking games include some PS4 games because overall it was impressive(facial animations, animations in general etc.)

I think something like TLOU PT 2 in 1440P looks better than say The Witcher 3 or FFXV at native 4K/60fps on PC. Those games have amazing image quality and framerate but the overall game logic is worse and that's not something a beefier video card can fix.
All true. I honestly think framerate effects visuals far more than any resolution after 1440p.
For anything competitive I'm taking a high refresh rate, but for everything else resolution is more noticeable. But 60 fps minimum. I had my 1080p240hz next to a 1440p165 next to 4k144 and the 4k was easily more impressive than both. Regardless, I choose my OLED over everything and it's hdmi 2.1, so it'll do 4k120 once the new cards come out. We'll see what the TLOU2 actually looks like when we get the final build. Uncharted does not impress me nearly as much as it impresses you. I see muddy textures, terrible looking background environments, no aliasing, low frame rates. The facial animations are excellent, though.
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
66,084
Reputation
10,549
Daps
221,045
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
For anything competitive I'm taking a high refresh rate, but for everything else resolution is more noticeable. But 60 fps minimum. I had my 1080p240hz next to a 1440p165 next to 4k144 and the 4k was easily more impressive than both. Regardless, I choose my OLED over everything and it's hdmi 2.1, so it'll do 4k120 once the new cards come out. We'll see what the TLOU2 actually looks like when we get the final build. Uncharted does not impress me nearly as much as it impresses you. I see muddy textures, terrible looking background environments, no aliasing, low frame rates. The facial animations are excellent, though.
Brotha. U just being elitist imo. On a monitor anything after 1440p is diminishing returns. Ain’t no way in hell is it more impressive than a smooth framerate with great art style and graphic fidelity. Especially on current games. It makes more of a difference for old games. For instance. I would choose my 5120x1440 monitor any day over a standard 4K monitor. shyt even Linus tested this shyt out. nikka sat people in front of a 1080p monitor, a 1440p monitor, and a 4K Monitor. And for GAMING. They really didn’t think it made THAT much of a difference after 1440p. It definitely makes a difference. But not more than better performance. Which is why I say 1800p around there is enough to barely tell the difference between 4K and in the PC community 1440p is considered the sweet spot for monitors. 4K monitors matter more for people who do art, graphics and media. Also anything that requires the sharpest text.
 

Barney Rubble

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,935
Reputation
3,820
Daps
22,488
Reppin
NULL
Brotha. U just being elitist imo. On a monitor anything after 1440p is diminishing returns. Ain’t no way in hell is it more impressive than a smooth framerate with great art style and graphic fidelity. Especially on current games. It makes more of a difference for old games. For instance. I would choose my 5120x1440 monitor any day over a standard 4K monitor. shyt even Linus tested this shyt out. nikka sat people in front of a 1080p monitor, a 1440p monitor, and a 4K Monitor. And for GAMING. They really didn’t think it made THAT much of a difference. It definitely makes a difference. But not more than better performance. Which is why I say 1800p around there is enough to barely tell the difference and in the PC community 1440p is considered the sweet spot for monitors. 4K monitors matter more for people who do art, graphics and media.
I'm not trying to be an elitist, I'm just stating my personal experiences with high end shyt. Once you're used to a certain standard the downgrades are much more noticeable then just seeing it all for the first time like a Linus video. For instance, I was playing overwatch a lot on my 4k144 then I switched to my 1080p240 and my aim was garbage cuz everything looked so blurry. I was used to seeing the eyes of my enemies but now they were just blurry pixels. It's hard to explain but it's real. I barely talk in this forum cuz I don't want to sound like an elitist, but I take offense when console gaming is made to sound just as good or near as good as high end PC gaming.
 

Insensitive

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
12,592
Reputation
4,945
Daps
43,166
Reppin
NULL
\
PS3/360 was a good value at the time of release.

1364849716655ips1c.jpg
This.
The same goes for the original Xbox.
Ps4/Xbone/WiiU (and the original wii) stood out because the focus was to save money
during manufacturing. Though in certain ways Ps4/Xbone offered the best they could (there was
no better option from their vendor for CPU. Jaguar was all they had before going into production.)
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
66,084
Reputation
10,549
Daps
221,045
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
I'm not trying to be an elitist, I'm just stating my personal experiences with high end shyt. Once you're used to a certain standard the downgrades are much more noticeable then just seeing it all for the first time like a Linus video. For instance, I was playing overwatch a lot on my 4k144 then I switched to my 1080p240 and my aim was garbage cuz everything looked so blurry. I was used to seeing the eyes of my enemies but now they were just blurry pixels. It's hard to explain but it's real. I barely talk in this forum cuz I don't want to sound like an elitist, but I take offense when console gaming is made to sound just as good or near as good as high end PC gaming.
I understand dropping down to 1080p because that’s DEF noticeable. I’m talking about 1440p and higher.
 
Top