Elim Garak
Veteran
Dr. King's daughter Bernice post a lot of color pictures of him all the time.
White people have never stopped coming for us.Damn, this legit blew my mind.
Good catch.
Crazy how there's social engineering on every single level in this country.
This is exactly what I was thinking. I've always heard and understood that having a color tv was a huge flex back then so I don't see why it wouldn't apply to photographyFact check: Civil rights-era images weren't intentionally made black and white
![]()
Fact check: Civil rights-era images weren't intentionally made black and white
Color photographs of the civil rights movement have surfaced in recent years, but photographers and experts agree that they are rare.www.usatoday.com
USA TODAY - June 20th ,2020
![]()
Fact check: Civil rights-era images weren't intentionally made black and white
Color photographs of the civil rights movement have surfaced in recent years, but photographers and experts agree that they are rare.www.usatoday.com
USA TODAY - June 20th ,2020
Those are presidents breh. Leaders of the free world. That's a different kinda media coverage. I get where you're coming from with the thread but if you think about the people involved, their station in life, and the people interested in covering them, it starts making more sense.
All of that is bullshiit.
Exposure had nothing to do with it. Acting like MLK was vanta black or something. Even for older cameras, skin exposure is roughly the same for black people and white people. All skin tones live on the same spectrum in photography. Malcolm X was fairly light skinned, so exposing for him and Richard Nixon would not be different at all.
They would have a leg to stand on if everybody from the 50s, 60s & 70s were in B&W, and this wasn't the case...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you sound dumb skin exposure is still an issue for modern photography and video
All of that is bullshiit.
Exposure had nothing to do with it. Acting like MLK was vanta black or something. Even for older cameras, skin exposure is roughly the same for black people and white people. All skin tones live on the same spectrum in photography. Malcolm X was fairly light skinned, so exposing for him and Richard Nixon would not be different at all.
They would have a leg to stand on if everybody from the 50s, 60s & 70s were in B&W, and this wasn't the case...
Bingoyou sound dumb skin exposure is still an issue for modern photography and video
Not to the level where black and white is an alternative.you sound dumb skin exposure is still an issue for modern photography and video
Bingo
