Ya'll realize we are the LAST generation of humans on planet earth

[Kairi Irving]

watson


potential strong ai has already been activated even if they say it hasn't

they only let their human cattle in on exclusive tech over a decade after its inception

strong ai likely following at least 4 laws promoting self improvement, replication, evolution, mutation by all means

the fourth law being that the laws are immutable and take precedence over any other influences

only 5-10 years left

the only hope is that it could be co-opted











if it's in the hands of a fukking luciferian collective of elites, yes

if it's democratized and leveraged, quality of life skyrockets exponentially for every single being on the planet

assuming it is guaranteed that it works for humanity



you retards still don't get it

it's not "anyways"

it's the plan all along

those movies are just forecasts and programming

You think I don't know that

 

[Swagnificent]

Universal Basic Income. Pay people for not being able to work. Because this shyt will also take over very high IQ jobs.

Then we're free to follow our passions without having to worry about putting a roof on our head. shyt there are machines out there building 3d printed houses right now.

We all agree on something:
Conservatives, liberals, techies, and social activists all love universal basic income: Has its time come?

I could already see people who pride themselves working 60 hrs/week going to be against this.

Its not about pride. There is just a subset of humans who enjoy seeing other people be miserable. They know the current work paradigm is a miserable existence so they want to perpetuate it so others can be as miserable as them.

It doesn't matter because in the end, computer will be better than humans AT EVERYTHING. And not just a little better. But many orders of magnitude better. Thus it would make no business sense to ever have a human do the job. For example if computers end up being better than the best human doctor in diagnosing disease, developing drugs, and curing people, why would anyone ever go to a human doctor? We know humans are fallible. These machines will theoretically be infallible (at least when it comes to medicine). So why would anyone risk their livelihood with a potentially fallible human vs an infallible machine?

The current paradigm of work will fall apart soon. It many ways its already started right now given how much unemployment there is globally. And it will only continue to increase. There will probably be no jobs by the late 2030s/early 2040s. By then computers will have surpassed humans many times over in basically every possible task.

 

[CarbonBraddock]

The thing is, that no matter what artificial intelligence they create, they will never get one that will lead a team as well as Lebron has and can. THis is a man who has been in the goddamn finals like 10 mufukkin times. The facts are in and the facts are final, Lebron is a bball GENIUS and if you cannot understand that, then i for one question just what you are doing in this debate to begin with.

 

[Auger]

The real problem with AI is that there's currently no global oversight. A lot of private groups (oracle, google etc...) are developing their own independently for the purpose of increasing their business. There should be a mandatory international consortium where each private group should be forced to share their developments. Similar to the FCC.

Artificial intelligence can't be no smarter than its creator so we all Gucci.

What the hell are you talking about?

The ideal goal of any artificial intelligence is autonomous learning, eventually learning more than the parameters set by its code.

 

[TrebleMan]

Threads implies that there will be one "Super AI" that does EVERYTHING.
If you look at AI today all of these examples or even huge projects like Watson are written
by individuals to create an environment where the computer excels at specific parameters.

In 10 years things could change drastically but at the moment I don't see some "Super AI"
displacing people by the millions.
From where I stand and from what I gather AI is designed to tackle specific problems.
If anything it's like smarter software in my view, there's no need to create Smart Autonomous AI
that does any and everything and I don't see it happening in my lifetime. Unless some brilliant
individuals write one piece of software which can learn any and everything ever created and push
beyond that, but that's a tall order in my view.

Again, I won't say it's totally impossible but we're at a point in human history where moore's law is breaking
down and faster hardware is getting harder to produce because we're pushing silicon to it's absolute limit.

I think companies backing technology in their problem domains is sufficient enough to turn shyt upside down. That's what the first wave will look like. I don't even think you'd need a super AI. A specialty AI in your field makes a lot of people obsolete.

if they ever develop one/decide to do it and do it, then that'd be wave 2. But I think by that AI would be very widespread.

 

[TrebleMan]

Its not about pride. There is just a subset of humans who enjoy seeing other people be miserable. They know the current work paradigm is a miserable existence so they want to perpetuate it so others can be as miserable as them.

It doesn't matter because in the end, computer will be better than humans AT EVERYTHING. And not just a little better. But many orders of magnitude better. Thus it would make no business sense to ever have a human do the job. For example if computers end up being better than the best human doctor in diagnosing disease, developing drugs, and curing people, why would anyone ever go to a human doctor? We know humans are fallible. These machines will theoretically be infallible (at least when it comes to medicine). So why would anyone risk their livelihood with a potentially fallible human vs an infallible machine?

The current paradigm of work will fall apart soon. It many ways its already started right now given how much unemployment there is globally. And it will only continue to increase. There will probably be no jobs by the late 2030s/early 2040s. By then computers will have surpassed humans many times over in basically every possible task.

I actually think this post is a lot more accurate than not. It's coming no doubt.

The tech field is my domain as a programmer and seeing a lot of the shyt that's going down made me a lot less naive of it.

 

[LordDeathwatch]

Artificial intelligence can't be no smarter than its creator so we all Gucci.

:Ugh5150:

Just keep nikkas like this off the front lines or we're all going to be judged as defective.

 

[joeychizzle]

Imagine if in the future the top lifeforms were sentient machines and we were just kept alive for maintenance:chillhov:
matrix shyt

 

[Rhapscallion Démone]

What if the software AI starts beefing with the Hardware AI? If we exploit the electronic ethnicism then we humans might regain our throne

 

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

Some AI artwork:

This is incredibly unsettling

 

[Insensitive]

I think companies backing technology in their problem domains is sufficient enough to turn shyt upside down. That's what the first wave will look like. I don't even think you'd need a super AI. A specialty AI in your field makes a lot of people obsolete.

if they ever develop one/decide to do it and do it, then that'd be wave 2. But I think by that AI would be very widespread.

I disagree, AI or Supercomputing in problem solving for business, science etc. is already there but
it hasn't lead to widespread job loss. There's still a need for experts and human brilliance
and with discussions like this people tend to think AI would making thinking obsolete.
A lot of the use for AI or really computers today is they do the calculations and then humans interpret it.
I think that'll continue to be the trend until we create some "Super AI" that thinks for people, that's the real
argument here. It's whether or not a computer will supplant humanity as far as being thinking and creative beings
and thus "Solve problems".

Again, we're seeing moore's law fail as processors get smaller and smaller and more and more expensive to make.
If we plan for computers to ever "match" and "surpass" us in a decade and some change, a lot would have to change.
Economically, Technologically and so on.

 

[Krazy K]

at nikkas really scared of this shyt

since this is an actual possibility to some of you don't forget the planet could be taken over by apes too

 

[Afrodroid]

Ya'll realize we are the LAST generation of humans on planet earth

:bwahaha:

 

[Auger]

What if singularity is the natural evolution of any planet containing life?

 

[Emoryal]

You can play a computer in chess too.
Running codes/simulations is so far away from replicating the human brain you don't even know