YES that ETHER made JAY-Z stronger HE DROPPING 5%/MOORISH JEWELS on MAGNA CARTA

[Blackout]

I'm done.

I'm just going to end up repeating myself.

Your assertion is the same thing is a claim. Its what you're projecting out there into the world about a particular entity or situation or quality or characteristic.

It doesn't matter how objective or to what extent you claim to substantiate it.

Its something...anything you put your support or stock in.

You say that an assertion is the same thing as a claim yet the dictionary says otherwise

Who am I to believe?

Should I believe the dictionarys definition or should i ignore it and believe your definition?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You say that an assertion is the same thing as a claim yet the dictionary says otherwise

Who am I to believe?

Should I ignore the dictionary definition or ignore it and believe your definition?

Bruh. It doesn't matter if you can prove it or how factual you think it is.

ITS SOMETHING YOURE SAYING.

IF YOU BELIEVE THERES A GOD, THATS A CLAIM YOURE MAKING.

Its LITERALLY the simplest aspect of this argument.

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Man @Napoleon is a real pedant, he would make the real Napoleon proud

 

[Blackout]

Bruh. It doesn't matter if you can prove it or how factual you think it is.

ITS SOMETHING YOURE SAYING.

IF YOU BELIEVE THERES A GOD, THATS A CLAIM YOURE MAKING.

Its LITERALLY the simplest aspect of this argument.

That's the issue with your statement.

For it to be a claim it must be an assertion of truth. No matter how much you enlarge your text you can't change the dictionary defintion.

My opinion isn't making as assertion as fact because fact effects us all and having an opinion is nothing close to saying something is fact.

In my opinion a movie could be bad but that doesn't mean that I'm saying that a movie is bad as fact therefore there is no claim.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

That's the issue with your statement.

For it to be a claim it must be an assertion of truth. No matter how much you enlarge your text you can't change the dictionary defintion.

Claims are MERELY ASSERTIONS.

Thats all they are.

They don't have to be statements of fact. People don't make claims they don't think are true.

fukk the dictionary. You know precisely what I mean when I'm talking about claims.

My opinion isn't making as assertion as fact because fact effects us all and having an opinion is nothing close to saying something is fact.

Yes it is.

Your opinion IS your assertion.

It doesn't matter how factual you align yourself with that statement.


Which fukked up definition are you using?



Can we end this assault on semantics and this affront of yours to the battle on logic?

 

[Blackout]

Claims are MERELY ASSERTIONS.

Thats all they are.

They don't have to be statements of fact. People don't make claims they don't think are true.

fukk the dictionary. You know precisely what I mean when I'm talking about claims.

Yes it is.

Your opinion IS your assertion.

It doesn't matter how factual you align yourself with that statement.


Which fukked up definition are you using?

Can we end this assault on semantics and this affront of yours to the battle on logic?

Even in those definitions you posted it says that a claim is to say something is fact.

My opinion isn't doing that so again it shows that my opinion isn't a claim.

Your the one fighting against semantics if you can't even use a word right.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Even in those definitions it says that a claim is to say something is fact. :pachah:

My opinion isn't doing that so again it shows that my opinion isn't a claim.

HOLY shyt YOU DUMB ASS.

You're one of those jackasses that love to use one subset of a definition as the TOTAL definition of a word.

it CLEARLY says that its an assertion in ALL of those definitions, and the one you're clinging to isn't even the top or more associated definition.

 

[Blackout]

HOLY shyt YOU DUMB ASS.

You're one of those jackasses that love to use one subset of a definition as the TOTAL definition of a word.

it CLEARLY says that its an assertion in ALL of those definitions, and the one you're clinging to isn't even the top or more associated definition.

I CLEARLY said that yes I was saying an "assertion."

Look back at my earlier posts and see for yourself where I said it.

What I am CLEARLY saying is that I'm not making a "claim."

Because not all assertions are claims.

Lrn2read

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@7Revo I'm done.

You're religious. That makes you stupid.

You're a deist. That makes you religious and stupid

You're a solipsistic troll. That makes you incredibly annoying and undeniably swarmy.

 

[Blackout]

I'm not religious. That makes you delusional cuz I do not follow a religion I only have an opinion that another may have created this world that we live in the same way we can create things ourselves.

It isn't complex, it isn't a system it isn't even strict to be considered a religion when its nothing more than a guess.

I'm not a deist. That makes you uninformed about me because in my opinion this higher power still intervenes with the current world.

I'm not trolling. You came at me trying to prove me wrong and I defended myself properly which pissed you off.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I'm not religious. That makes you delusional cuz I do not follow a religion I only have an opinion that another may have created this world that we live in the same way we can create things ourselves.

It isn't complex, it isn't a system it isn't even strict to be considered a religion when its nothing more than a guess.

I'm not a deist. That makes you uninformed about me because in my opinion this higher power still intervenes with the current world.

I'm not trolling. You came at me trying to prove me wrong and I defended myself properly which pissed you off.

Thats a religious claim. Thats the LITERAL definition of a deist.

Doesn't matter how many features, rituals or tenets within that position there are...or how few there are.

You're making an assertion to the positive that you believe theres something out there.

A deist doesn't merely believe in an intercessory god, it believes in A god(s) or supernatural power(s).

Thats it.

You're not even TRYING to defend yourself PROPERLY. When you get exposed for having a religious position, your punk ass keeps trying to evade being responsible for the bullshyt you align yourself with.

nikka, you're even claiming that SOME SUPERNATURAL ENTITY CREATED EVERYTHING. Thats a religious claim if I EVER heard one.

 

[Blackout]

Thats a religious claim. Thats the LITERAL definition of a deist.

Doesn't matter how many features, rituals or tenets within that position there are...or how few there are.

You're making an assertion to the positive that you believe theres something out there.

A deist doesn't merely believe in an intercessory god, it believes in A god(s) or supernatural power(s).

Thats it.

Yea the religious make that claim too but that still doesn't mean that Im religious since that claim isn't restricted only to the religious alone.

So we gonna act like the part of the literal definition of deism where "deists dont believe that the god intervenes with the current universe" doesn't exist?

Ok if that's what you want ill entertain it.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Yea the religious make that claim too but that still doesn't mean that Im religious since that claim isn't restricted only to the religious alone.

So we gonna act like the part of the literal definition of deism where "deist doesn't believe that the god intervenes with the current universe" doesn't exist?

Ok if that's what you want ill entertain it.

Bruh. It doesn't matter if your god intervenes or not.

If you claim it doesn't intervene, you're making a claim about your god.

if you claim it does intervene, you're making a claim about your god.

Those are religious claims.

Thats what you need to understand.

 

[Blackout]

Bruh. It doesn't matter if your god intervenes or not.

If you claim it doesn't intervene, you're making a claim about your god.

if you claim it does intervene, you're making a claim about your god.

Those are religious claims.

Thats what you need to understand.

fukk your defintion of claim. I will go according to the dictionary defintion where you "assert things as fact" to make an actual claim.

Looking back that wasnt even a claim. That was a opinion. I already showed you that I'm making assertions not claims.

Plus religious people don't say the same thing because they entertain the supernatural, they are more structured than a simple guess, they are more than just a belief/opinion. You using the term religious too loosely.

I'm not making a claim yet again. My opinion is that it may intervene but its not asserted as fact in any way so its not a claim.

As long as something doesn't assert something as truth it isn't a claim. Go argue with the dictionary that you and I both referenced.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

fukk your defintion of claim. I will go according to the dictionary defintion where you "assert things as fact" to make a claim.

Looking back that wasnt even a claim. That was a opinion. I already showed you that I'm making assertions not claims.

Plus religious people don't say the same thing because they entertain the supernatural, they are more structured than a simple guess, they are more than just a belief/opinion. You using the term religious too loosely.

I'm not making a claim yet again. My opinion is that it may intervene but its not asserted as fact in any way so its not a claim.

As long as something doesn't assert something as truth it isn't a claim. Go argue with the dictionary that you and I both referenced.

You claim your god doesn't intervene in the world.

THATS AN ASSERTION ABOUT YOUR GOD!!!

and you got the audacity to act like your definition aint like 4 lines below mine...