GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
I agree with your last sentence, they go overboard with that. But honestly, Punk HAS been right in almost everything he's said since the heel turn. That's what makes it so funny. In Vince's conservative, PG-product, bizarro-world head, criticizing Jerry Lawler's commentary and saying the WWE championship should be the main event make you "the bad guy."That's actually decent but far too complex for the audience they're catering too. Honestly, I don't see Punk being anything but a cookie cutter "serious" heel to go along with Ziggler's cocky heel and Bryan's goofy heel.
None of these characters have much depth to them. Think about it, WHO is Dolph Ziggler? WHAT'S his purpose?
Why is Punk beating up announcers if he wants respect? WWE always goes the cheap heat route. Why can't heels be right? Why must a small change in ideals cause a complete personality overall?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
And what's the complex part about what I wrote? You're telling me Montreal isn't gonna get what Punk is talking about when he references the Screwjob?


